Cited by 383Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceCrime Patterns and Interventions

Culturally Grounded Substance Use Prevention: An Evaluation of the keepin' it R.E.A.L. Curriculum

Hecht, Michael L., Marsiglia, Flavio Francisco, Elek, Elvira, Wagstaff, David A., Kulis, Stephen, Dustman, Patricia, Miller-Day, Michelle·2003·Prevention Science

Abstract

This paper reports on the evaluation of a culturally grounded prevention intervention targeting substance use among urban middle-school students. The curriculum consists of 10 lessons promoting antidrug norms and teaching resistance and other social skills, reinforced by booster activities and a media campaign. Three versions were delivered: Mexican American, combined African American and European American, and Multicultural. Thirty-five middle schools were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 versions or the control. Students completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires over a 2-year period (total 6,035 respondents). Analyses utilizing a generalized estimating equations approach assessed the overall effectiveness of cultural grounding and the cultural matching hypothesis. Support was found for the intervention's overall effectiveness, with statistically significant effects on gateway drug use as well as norms, attitudes, and resistance strategies but with little support for the cultural matching hypothesis. Specific contrasts found the Mexican American and Multicultural versions impacted the most outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026016131401

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., Dustman, P., & Miller-Day, M.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hecht, Michael L.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2003-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
233-248
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1577230560
Cited by
383
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 05629, R01DA005629)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
substance use prevention, cultural grounding, Mexican American students, African American students, European American students, junior high school students, resistance strategies, social skills, media campaigns, multicultural curriculum
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Culture, Curriculum, Ethnicity, Health Education, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, School Health Services, United States, Program Evaluation, Substance-Related Disorders, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review