Cited by 462Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of the Neuropsychological Profiles of the DSM-IV Subtypes of ADHD

Chhabildas, Nomita, Pennington, Bruce F., Willcutt, Erik G.·2001·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Recent research on the DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has demonstrated that the subtypes differ in demographic characteristics, types of functional impairment, and profiles of comorbidity with other childhood disorders. However, little research has tested whether the subtypes differ in underlying neuropsychological deficits. This study compared the neuropsychological profiles of children without ADHD (n = 82) and children who met symptom criteria for DSM-IV Predominantly Inattentive subtype (ADHD-IA; n = 67), Predominantly Hyperactive Impulsive subtype (ADHD-HI; n = 14), and Combined subtype (ADHD-C; n = 33) in the areas of processing speed, vigilance, and inhibition. We hypothesized that children with elevations of inattention symptoms (ADHD-IA and ADHD-C) would be impaired on measures of vigilance and processing speed, whereas children with significant hyperactivity/impulsivity (ADHD-HI and ADHD-C) would be impaired on measures of inhibition. Contrary to prediction, symptoms of inattention best predicted performance on all dependent measures, and ADHD-IA and ADHD-C children had similar profiles of impairment. In contrast, children with ADHD-HI were not significantly impaired on any dependent measures once subclinical symptoms of inattention were controlled. Our results do not support distinct neuropsychological deficits in ADHD-IA and ADHD-C children, and suggest that symptoms of inattention, rather than symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsiv…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012281226028

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Borenstein, M., & Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses: A computer program. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project. In D. Gray & J. Kavanaugh J. (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
  3. Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Examiner's manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  4. McBurnett, K. (1997). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A review of diagnostic issues. In T. A. Widiger, A. J. Frances, H. Pincus, R. Ross, M. First, & W. Davis (Eds.), DSM sourcebook (pp. 111–143). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  5. Milich, R., Balentine, A. C., & Lynam, D. R. (in press).ADHD-combined type and ADHD predominately inattentive type are distinct and unrelated disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
  6. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral genetics (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
  7. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Chhabildas, N., Pennington, B. F., & Willcutt, E. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Chhabildas, Nomita
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2001-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
529-540
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2142256026
Cited by
461
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31mh012017-01, 5p01hd011681-12)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH12017, F32 MH 12100, F32MH012100, MH 38820, MH 00419)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 27802, HD11681, P50HD027802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined subtype, neuropsychological deficits, processing speed, sustained attention, inhibition, inattentive symptoms, hyperactivity/impulsivity, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review