Cited by 249Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The ADHD Response-Inhibition Deficit as Measured by the Stop Task: Replication with DSM–IV Combined Type, Extension, and Qualification

Nigg, Joel T.·1999·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Although response inhibition has been proposed as a core element of child attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the literature is heavily reliant on studies using DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria, older methods of measuring response inhibition, samples of boys, and failing to control thoroughly for comorbid problems--both as diagnoses and as subclinical variation. The present study replicated a deficit in response inhibition in the ADHD combined type (DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) using samples matched on age and sex. The study replicated an effect size of approximately d = .6 in boys with ADHD, and observed an even larger effect size for girls, although the Sex x Group interaction was nonsignificant. Children with ADHD also had problems with response output, shown by variable responding. Excluding comorbid conduct disorder, reading disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder from the sample did not alter the results. Correlations indicated that response inhibition was associated with both attentional problems and reading level. Covarying for reading problems did not eliminate the ADHD group effect, but the association of response inhibition with reading clearly requires further examination. Overall, the study supported the role of response inhibition in the DSM-IV ADHD combined type, but with key qualifications as to degree of specificity in reference both to comorbid problems and other executive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021980002473

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaction time variability correlates with measures of behavioral inattention, and in a minority of studies also with hyperactivity-impulsivity.

    “Where relations between RTV and the ADHD symptom domains have been examined, RTV has correlated with measures of behavioral inattention [48,52,53] but has also been found to correlate with hyperactivityimpulsivity in a minority of studies”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Research on reaction time variability and ADHD symptom domains or subtypes has not convincingly associated reaction time variability with either symptom domain or any specific symptom, although relations with inattention are more consistent.

    “Research examining relations between RTV and the ADHD symptom domains or ADHD subtypes has not been convincingly associated with either ADHD symptom domain or any specific ADHD symptoms, although relations between RTV and inattention seem to be more consistent in the literature [48,52,53].”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The commonality between motor response selection and response inhibition is reflected in executive deficits associated with ADHD, where impairments in both motor response inhibition and motor response selection/execution are observed.

    “The commonality between motor response selection and response inhibition is further reflected in the executive deficits associated with ADHD, where impairments in both motor response inhibition (Aron & Poldrack, 2005; Barkley, 1997; Nigg, 1999) and motor response selection/execution (Banaschewski et al., 2004; Ben-Pazi et al., 2003; Rubia et al., 2003) are observed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nigg, J. T.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nigg, Joel T.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
1999-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
393-402
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W243090151
Cited by
249
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh057244-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03-MH57244)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, stop-signal task, replication, comorbidities, executive function, sex differences, reading level, attention deficits, children
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Models, Psychological, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review