Cited by 224Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Neuropsychological correlates of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Explainable by comorbid disruptive behavior or reading problems?

Nigg, Joel T., Hinshaw, Stephen P., Carte, Estol T., Treuting, Jennifer J.·1998·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Questions remain as to whether neuropsychological processing deficits associated with child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are accounted for by co-occurring disorders, especially in clinical samples. The authors examined ADHD and comorbid oppositional defiant, conduct, and reading disorders. Boys with ADHD displayed hypothesized deficits on effortful neuropsychological tasks regardless of categorical or dimensional control of comorbid antisocial behavior problems. The same result held when reading problems were controlled, although boys with ADHD plus reading disorder (n = 16) exhibited specific impairment on linguistic output tasks. Simultaneous control of reading and behavior problems yielded the same result. Overall, results suggest that in a clinical sample, difficulties on effortful neuropsychological tasks that require planning or controlled motor output pertain at least in part to ADHD and are not fully accounted for by comorbid conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.107.3.468

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADHD was positively associated with BI deficits, controlling for ODD and CD.

    “There is also evidence that ADHD was positively associated with BI deficits, controlling for ODD and CD (Nigg et al. 1998) and that ADHD predicted BI even after accounting for concurrent ODD among 6–13 year-old children (de Zeeuw et al. 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nigg, J. T., Hinshaw, S. P., Carte, E. T., & Treuting, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1998-08
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
468-480
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2071819008
Cited by
222
References
74
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31mh010462-02, 1r03mh057244-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03-MH57244, F31 MH10462-01, R01 MH 45064, R01MH045064)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood ADHD, comorbidities, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, reading disorders, neuropsychological deficits, effortful control, planning, antisocial behavior, boys
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Dyslexia, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Volition, Chi-Square Distribution, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review