CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Health Policy Implementation ScienceChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Development and Dissemination of the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program: A Multilevel, Evidence-Based System of Parenting and Family Support

Sanders, Matthew R., Turner, Karen M. T., Markie-Dadds, Carol·2002·Prevention Science
DOI 10.1023/a:1019942516231
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper describes the theoretical and empirical basis of a unique multilevel system of parenting and family support known as the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. The program incorporates five levels of intervention on a tiered continuum of increasing strength and narrowing population reach. The self-regulation framework of the program is discussed and an ecological or systems-contextual approach to dissemination of the program to service providers is highlighted. Implementation issues to consider in effective program dissemination are discussed including managing the "politics" of family support, strategies for coping with changes in government, maintaining quality, balancing cost and sustainability, and remaining data responsive. Future research directions are identified.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019942516231

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (2000a). National action plan for promotion, prevention and early intervention for mental health. Canberra: Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.
  2. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. (2000b). LIFE-Living is for everyone: A framework for prevention of suicide and self-harm in Australia. Canberra: Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.
  3. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed). New York: Free Press.
  4. Sanders, M. R. (1992). Every parent: A positive guide to children's behaviour. Sydney, Australia: Addison-Wesley.
  5. Sanders, M. R. (Ed.). (1995). Healthy families, healthy nation: Strategies for promoting family mental health in Australia. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
  6. Sanders, M. R. (1998). The empirical status of psychological interventions with families of children and adolescents. In L. L'Abate (Ed.), Family psychopathology: The relational roots of dysfunctional behavior. New York: Guilford.
  7. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Rinaldis, M., Firman, D., & Baig, N. (2002). Strengthening families:Asurvey of Queensland families. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Health.
  8. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, K. M. T. (Producers/Directors). (1996). Every parent's survival guide [videotape and booklet]. Brisbane, Australia: Families International.
  9. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Turner, K. M. T., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. (2000b). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A guide to the system. Brisbane, Australia: Families International.
  10. Sultana, C., Matthews, J., De Bortoli, D., & Cann, W. (2000, February). Outcome evaluation of the primary care level of the Positive Parenting Program implemented in a community setting by primary care practitioners. Paper presented at the Helping Families Change Conference: 2000 and Beyond, Brisbane, Australia.
  11. Turner, K. M. T., & Sanders, M. R. (2002, June). Dissemination of psychological innovation to primary care professionals: Effectiveness and program uptake. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Brisbane, Australia.
  12. Williams, A. A., Zubrick, S. R., Silburn, S. R., & Sanders, M. R. (1997). A population based intervention to prevent childhood conduct disorder: The Perth Positive Parenting Program demonstration project. Paper presented at the 9th National Health Promotion Conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–298 of 298

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., & Markie-Dadds, C.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Prevention Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
173-189
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
DOI
10.1023/a:1019942516231
OpenAlex
W2099122664
Cited by
296
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
Triple P-Positive Parenting Program, parent training, family support, multilevel interventions, ecological systems approach, program dissemination, implementation issues, program sustainability, cost and quality, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Family Therapy, Humans, Parents, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Social Support, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Program Development, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review