The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nearly all analyses show Rubin's B<25%, Rubin's R of 0.5–2, and a percentage bias of <10% for each covariate (Fig. 1) (Morgan, 2018; Rubin, 2001).”
From Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: Results from a propensity score matching analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Rubin, 2001
In the citing paper
“We used directed acyclic graphs to identify factors that could be associated with both reading for pleasure and children's strengths and difficulties, or with children's strengths and difficulties only based on previous empirical research (Brookhart et al., 2006; Caliendo and Kopeinig, 2008; Rubin, 2001; Sauer and VanderWeele, 2013).”
From Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: Results from a propensity score matching analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Rubin, 2001
In the citing paper
“Secondly, this process of variable selection can be based on previous research [59].”
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Self-citationRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2683903 · Cited by 6,472
Self-citation(1976) · Annals of Economic and Social Measurement · Cited by 5,035
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
Self-citationA Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 · Cited by 2,395
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1397 · Cited by 2,228
Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1993) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w4509 · Cited by 2,072
The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions
Imbens, G. W. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.3.706 · Cited by 1,779
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- AHCPR, “National medical expenditure survey, calendar year 1987,” Center for General Health Services Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service: Rockville,MD, 1992.
- D. J. Benjamin, “Does 401(k) eligibility increase net national savings?: reducing bias in the eligibility effect estimate,” A. B. Honors Thesis in Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
- GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office), “Breast conservation versus mastectomy: patient survival in day-to-day medical practice and randomized studies,” Report #GAO-PEMD-95-9, U.S. General Accounting Office: Washington, D.C., 1995.
- G. W. Harrison, ‘Expert Report, April 27, 1998: “Health care expenditures attributable to smoking in Oklahoma,”’ The State of Oklahoma, ex rel., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., Defendants, Case No. CJ-96-1499-L, District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma, 1998.
- J. Hill, D. B. Rubin and N. Thomas, “The design of the New York school choice scholarship program evaluation,” in Research Designs: Inspired by the Work of Donald Campbell, (L. Bickman, ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 155-180, 1999.
- L. Roseman, “Reducing bias in the estimate of the difference in survival in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
- P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, “Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling incorporating the propensity score,” The American Statistician, 39, pp. 33-38, 1985. · DOI
- D. B. Rubin, “The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment in observational studies,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, 1970.
- D. B. Rubin, “William, G. Cochran's contributions to the design, analysis, and evaluation of observational studies,” in W. G. Cochran's Impact on Statistics ( Rao and Sedransk, eds.), John Wiley, New York, pp. 37-69, 1984.
- D. B. Rubin, “Statistical assumptions in the estimation of the causal effects of smoking due to the conduct of the tobacco industry,” in Social Science Methodology in the New Millennium. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology (J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw and P. Schmidt, eds.), October 6, 2000, Cologne, Germany, 1-22, 2000b.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Powers, B. W., Yan, J., Zhu, J., Linn, K. A., JAIN, S. H., Kowalski, J. L., & Navathe, A. S. (2020) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01793 · Cited by 18
Kern, C. A., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2020) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smaa028 · Cited by 18
Struck, S., Enns, J. E., Sanguins, J., Chartier, M., Nickel, N. C., Chateau, D. G., Sarkar, J., Burland, E., Hinds, A. M., Katz, A., et al. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105853 · Cited by 19
Garcia–López, M.-À., Solé‐Ollé, A., & Viladecans‐Marsal, E. (2015) · Regional Science and Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.05.008 · Cited by 18
“and Rubin, D.B. (1985): “Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score,” The American Statistician 39(1), 33-38. Rubin, D.B. (2001): “Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to tobacco litigation,” Health Services & Outc…”
MethodInfluentialMcCombs-Thornton, K. L., & Foster, E. M. (2011) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.013 · Cited by 18
Research Designs for Program Evaluation
Wong, V. C., Wing, C., Steiner, P. M., Wong, M., & Cook, T. D. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202011 · Cited by 18
Berger, I., Kamble, A., Morton, O., Raj, V., Nair, S. R., Edwards, D. P., Wauchope, H. S., Joshi, V., Basu, P., Smith, B., et al. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02849-7 · Cited by 22
“73,74,85,87,88).”
Gender Equality in Mortgage Lending
Fang, L., & Munneke, H. J. (2017) · Real Estate Economics · doi:10.1111/1540-6229.12198 · Cited by 17
Beyond correlation: Towards matching strategy for causal inference in Information Science
Dong, X., Xu, J., Bu, Y., Zhang, C., Ding, Y., Hu, B., & Ding, Y. (2021) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551520979868 · Cited by 17
“Matchings have been used quite widely in various disciplines such as public health [33], the economy [34] and public policy [35].”
BackgroundSupporting innovative entrepreneurship: an evaluation of the Italian “Start-up Act”
Manaresi, F., Menon, C., & Santoleri, P. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab033 · Cited by 22
Kaslow, S. R., Vitiello, G. A., Prendergast, K. M., Hani, L., Cohen, S. M., Wolfgang, C. L., Berman, R. S., Lee, A. Y., & Correa‐Gallego, C. (2022) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-022-11477-5 · Cited by 17
“Body of pancreas 1149 (13) 300 (12) 849 (14)”
Kikuta, K., & Uesugi, M. (2023) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818322000261 · Cited by 17
“Rubin 2001. of the density tests are reported at the bottom of each pane.99 Although there are a few minor imbalances in four of the sixty-six balance metrics (6%), there is no consistent evidence of imbalance, and the density tests indicate no evidence of sorting.”
BackgroundMarquis‐Gravel, G., Boivin‐Proulx, L., Huang, Z., Zelenkofske, S. L., Lincoff, A. M., Mehran, R., Steg, P. G., Bode, C., Alexander, J. H., & Povsic, T. J. (2022) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.122.025666 · Cited by 17
International Student Mobility and Academic Performance: Does Timing Matter?
Granja, C. D., & Visentin, F. (2023) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-023-09755-6 · Cited by 17
“Additionally, Rubins’ B (the absolute standardized difference of the means of the linear index of the propensity score in the treated and non-treated group) and Rubin’s R (the ratio of treated to non-treated variances of the propensity score index) felt within the bounds suggested by Rubin (2001).”
Fu, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02149-0 · Cited by 17
Wang, B., Shao, X., Yang, X., & Xu, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1224152 · Cited by 17
The disclosure perspective of firm‐specific political risk measure from conference calls
Hossain, A. T., Masum, A. A., Hasan, M. M., Li, D., & Xu, J. (2024) · Financial Management · doi:10.1111/fima.12468 · Cited by 19
Regulatory Issues of Propensity Score Methodology Application to Drug and Device Safety Studies
Levenson, M. S., & Yue, L. Q. (2013) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2013.735778 · Cited by 16
Estimating the Effect of Premarital Cohabitation on Timing of Marital Disruption
Lü, B., Qian, Z., Cunningham, A., & Li, C.-L. (2012) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124112452395 · Cited by 17
McIntire, R. K., Nelson, A. A., Macy, J. T., Seo, D., & Kolbe, L. J. (2015) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.04.009 · Cited by 17
Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment
Vollmer, B. L., Nair, K. V., Sillau, S., Corboy, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Álvarez, E. (2018) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.700 · Cited by 17
“0% for DMF to NTZ, well within the 50% standard proposed by Rubin.(19)”
BackgroundInfluentialYu, B., Lim, H., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09485-7 · Cited by 17
“A ratio of the variances of the covariates after adjustment between .80 and 1.25 is desirable and those < .50 or > 2.0 are too extreme (Cochran 1965; Rubin 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWong, S., Buu, A., & Lin, H. (2020) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2020.1795325 · Cited by 18
The effects of youth labour market reforms: evidence from Italian apprenticeships
Albanese, A., Cappellari, L., & Leonardi, M. (2019) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpz053 · Cited by 19
Mayer, A., Hazboun, S., & Howe, P. D. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101910 · Cited by 17
Torregrossa, G., Sá, M. P., den Eynde, J. V., Malin, J. H., Sicouri, S., Wertan, M. C., Ramlawi, B., & Sutter, F. P. (2022) · Journal of Cardiac Surgery · doi:10.1111/jocs.16247 · Cited by 17
“25 was considered as an indicator of imbalance.(8)”
BackgroundOutcome Studies of Social, Behavioral, and Educational Interventions
Fräser, M. W., Guo, S., Ellis, A. R., Thompson, A. M., Wike, T. L., & Li, J. (2011) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731511406136 · Cited by 20
“Rubin (2001) introduced two balance statistics based on the propensity score logit: B, the standardized difference between groups, and R, the treatment-to-comparison variance ratio.”
MethodResearch Methods Priorities in Geriatric Palliative Medicine
Carlson, M. D. A. (2013) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.9492 · Cited by 17
Bilbao‐Terol, C., & Valdés, L. (2016) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1137546 · Cited by 17
“The next step is to match a treatment case with one or more control cases with similar values on the propensity score, and possibly other covariates, and the discarding of all unmatched units (Rubin 2001).”
BackgroundSubstance Use Behaviors and the Timing of Family Formation During Young Adulthood
Jang, J. B., Patrick, M. E., & Schuler, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x17710285 · Cited by 17
“20 indicate a good balance between exposure and control groups (Cohen, 1992; Rubin, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialInvestigating Causal DIF via Propensity Score Methods.
Liu, Y., Zumbo, B., Gustafson, P., Huang, Y., Kroc, E., & Wu, A. (2016) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/ewqz-n963 · Cited by 19
“…the characteristics of non-equivalent groups, so that treatment and control groups with the same value of propensity score have the same multivariate distribution of the observed covariates (e.g., Rosenbaum, 1995, 2002, 2010; Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983; 1985; Rubin, 2001; Schafer & Kang, 2008).”
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in hospital and hospital-at-home settings: a mixed-methods study
Gardner, M. P., Shepperd, S., Godfrey, M., Mäkelä, P., Tsiachristas, A., Singh-Mehta, A., Ellis, G., Khanna, P., Langhorne, P., Makin, S., et al. (2019) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr07100 · Cited by 17
“Discussing end-of-life care 31 (78) 9 (69)”
Kiehl, E. L., Amuthan, R., Adams, M. P., Love, T. E., Enfield, K. B., Gimple, L. W., Cantillon, D. J., & Menon, V. (2019) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.036 · Cited by 17
Manca, A., & Austin, P. C. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 17
Project ECHO Revisited: Propensity Score Analysis And HCV Treatment Outcomes
Page, K., Qeadan, F., Qualls, C., Thornton, K., & Arora, S. (2019) · Hepatic Medicine Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/hmer.s212855 · Cited by 15
Income disparity and incident cardiovascular disease in older Americans
Faselis, C. J., Safren, L. A., Allman, R. M., Lam, P. H., Brar, V., Morgan, C. J., Ahmed, A. A., DEEDWANIA, P. C., Alagiakrishnan, K., Sheikh, F. H., et al. (2021) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2021.07.010 · Cited by 16
Aristei, D., & Gallo, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179531 · Cited by 16
“Additionally, the values of both the standardized difference in the means (Rubin’s B) and the ratio of the variances (Rubin’s R) of the propensity scores between treated and untreated firms after matching are always within the ranges suggested by Rubin [43] for a balanced distribution of covariates (i.”
BackgroundInfluentialNitkin, C. R., Bamat, N. A., Lagatta, J. M., DeMauro, S. B., Lee, H. C., Patel, R. M., King, B., Slaughter, J. L., Campbell, J. P., Richardson, T., et al. (2022) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3788 · Cited by 16
Leone, P. P., Gohar, A., Pagnesi, M., Mangieri, A., Stefanini, G. G., Cacia, M. A., Cozzi, O., Barbanti, M., Teles, R. C., Adamo, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.044 · Cited by 16
Longo, V. L., Odjidja, E. N., Zanfini, B. A., Catarci, S., Carducci, B., Draisci, G., Lanzone, A., & Bevilacqua, E. (2023) · AJOG Global Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100174 · Cited by 16
“0 suggests a good balance.(14) Here, Rubin’s R value was 1.”
BackgroundFu, W., Zhao, W., & Deng, F. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13030256 · Cited by 19
Weaver, J. C., Hardin, J., Blacketer, C., Krumme, A. A., Jacobson, M. H., & Ryan, P. B. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02073-6 · Cited by 16
Chen, W., Tran, T. N., Townend, J., Christoff, G., Tsai, M., Altraja, A., Cochrane, B., Cosío, B. G., Sívori, M., Murray, R., et al. (2025) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.04.032 · Cited by 16
Effect of Warfarin on Outcomes in Septuagenarian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Roy, B., Desai, R. V., Mujib, M. U., Epstein, A. E., Zhang, Y., Guichard, J. L., Jones, L. G., Feller, M. A., Ahmed, M. I., Aban, I., et al. (2011) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.023 · Cited by 16
Arnardóttir, E. S., Lim, D. C., Keenan, B. T., Maislin, G., Benediktsdóttir, B., Júlíusson, S., Pack, A. I., & Gíslason, Þ. (2014) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12252 · Cited by 16
Lam, P. H., Dooley, D. J., Inampudi, C., Arundel, C., Fonarow, G. C., Butler, J., Wu, W.-C., Blackman, M. R., Anker, M. S., DEEDWANIA, P. C., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.006 · Cited by 16
Averdijk, M., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. (2018) · Longitudinal and Life Course Studies · doi:10.14301/llcs.v9i1.450 · Cited by 16
“the youths not placed in out-of-home care) group (Rubin, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodWellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. M. (2019) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1646876 · Cited by 19
“Number two, a propensity score method allows non-randomised studies to be designed similarly to randomised experiments (Rubin 2001).”
MethodRomano, D., & Traverso, S. (2019) · European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-019-00240-4 · Cited by 16
“…the consistency of all the matching estimators based on the linear distance between individual scores such as nearest neighbour, caliper and kernel (Rubin 2001; Imbens and Rubin 2015).6 On the other hand, it allows easy identification of the region of common support by imposing a caliper (Austin…”
BackgroundMethodHappich, M., Brnabic, A. J. M., Faries, D. E., Abrams, K. R., Winfree, K. B., Girvan, A. C., Jonsson, P. F., Johnston, J. A., Belger, M. A., & 1, I. G. W. P. (2020) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1854 · Cited by 16
Does firm size affect learning-by-exporting? Empirical evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
Esaku, S. (2020) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2020.1754150 · Cited by 16
“The absolute standardized difference inmeans of the propensity scores between the treated andmatched untreated groups, Rubin’s B is below 25 and the ratio of treated tomatched untreated variances of the propensity score, the Rubin’s R range between 0.5 and 2 as recommended (Rubin, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReconsidering Generative Objectives For Counterfactual Reasoning
Lu, D., Tao, C., Chen, J., Li, F., Guo, F., & Carin, L. (2020) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 16
Size matters? Or not: A/B testing with limited sample in automotive embedded software
Liu, Y., Mattos, D. I., Bosch, J., Olsson, H. H., & Lantz, J. (2021) · Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) · doi:10.1109/seaa53835.2021.00046 · Cited by 16
“…samples experiments [5], [14], and for experimental designs where there is prior information regarding the user characteristics and large variances between the users [15], the Balance Match Weighted yields good variance reduction by balancing the groups compared to full randomised experiments.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAfonso, W. B. (2014) · Public Budgeting & Finance · doi:10.1111/pbaf.12039 · Cited by 16
Lampach, N., & Morawetz, U. B. (2016) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1153795 · Cited by 18
“Similarly, the ratio of variance should be approximate to the value of 1 (Rubin 2001).”
BackgroundJing-wen, Z., & Song, J. (2024) · Water Policy · doi:10.2166/wp.2024.089 · Cited by 15
The effect of residential solar on energy insecurity among low- to moderate-income households
Yozwiak, M., Barbose, G. L., Carley, S. R., Forrester, S., Konisky, D. M., Memmott, T., Montañés, C. C., & O’Shaughnessy, E. (2025) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01730-y · Cited by 15
Cycle-Balanced Representation Learning For Counterfactual Inference
Zhou, G., Yao, L., Xu, X., Wang, C., & Zhu, L. (2022) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611977172.50 · Cited by 15
Hoedemakers, M. J., Karimi, M., Leijten, F., Goossens, L. M. A., Islam, M. K., Tsiachristas, A., & Mölken, M. R. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054672 · Cited by 15
Pre-paid meters and household electricity use behaviors: Evidence from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Beyene, A. D., Jeuland, M., Sebsibie, S., Hassen, S., Mekonnen, A., Meles, T. H., Pattanayak, S. K., & Klug, T. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113251 · Cited by 15
“In each case, following Rubin (2001), we estimate the standardised difference in the mean value (Rubin’s B) and the variance ratio (Rubin’s R) of the propensity score for pre-paid and post-paid meter users.”
MethodSunny, F. A., Karimanzira, T. T. P., Peng, W., Rahman, M. S., & Zuhui, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.961034 · Cited by 15
“The result confirms that the balancing property is satisfied as the thresholds for the variance ratio for balanced groups are 0.5 and 2 (Rubin, 2001; Stuart, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialEfficacy of an Adaptive Learning System on Course Scores
Lim, L., Lim, S. H., & Lim, W.-Y. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11010031 · Cited by 15
Li, H., & Yue, L. Q. (2023) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.2294 · Cited by 14
Managerial flexibility, capacity investment, and inventory levels
Aral, K. D., Giambona, E., & Wassenhove, L. V. V. (2023) · Production and operations management · doi:10.1111/poms.14067 · Cited by 7
Na, H., & Kang, J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20816 · Cited by 15
“If B 25 % and R within falls within the scope of [0.5, 2] [35], with all B-values less by 25 % and R-values ranging from 0.93 to 1.05.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVenture governance, CEO duality, and new venture performance
Li, M., Cao, Z. J., & Terjesen, S. A. (2024) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1495 · Cited by 14
The impacts of rural development project on resilience to climatic disasters: The case of Bangladesh
Park, B., & Ochieng, H. K. (2024) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106631 · Cited by 15
Tele-medicine controlled hospital at home is associated with better outcomes than hospital stay
Zychlinski, N., Fluss, R., Goldberg, Y., Zubli, D., Barkai, G., Zimlichman, E., & Segal, G. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309077 · Cited by 15
Accounting comparability and customer concentration
Chircop, J., Nguyen, N. Q., & Nguyen, T. T. (2024) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107244 · Cited by 15
Third-Party Presence Effect with Propensity Score Matching
Diop, A., Le, K. T., & Traugott, M. W. (2015) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smv005 · Cited by 15
Bangalore, S., Pencina, M. J., Kleiman, N. S., & Cohen, D. J. (2014) · Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1161/circinterventions.113.001126 · Cited by 15
Liao, Y., Siegel, P. Z., Garraza, L. G., Xu, Y., Yin, S., Scardaville, M. C., Gebreselassie, T., & Stephens, R. L. (2016) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303253 · Cited by 14
“For each community and year, we weighted BRFSS respondents in each subclass by the estimated number of individuals in that subclass in the REACH US population.(20) We estimated this number by using REACH US sampling weights.”
Profitability Effects and Fishery Subsidies: Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores
Duy, N. N., & Flaaten, O. (2016) · Marine Resource Economics · doi:10.1086/687930 · Cited by 15
“It is recommended that Rubin’s B be less than 25% and that Rubin’s R be between 0.5 and 2 for the samples to be considered sufficiently balanced (Rubin 2001). a Number of treated vessels falling outside the common support. b Rubin’s B value falling outside the limits.”
BackgroundInfluentialCrameri, A., Schuetz, C., Andreae, A., Koemeda, M., Schulthess, P., Tschuschke, V., & von Wyl, A. (2016) · Psychiatry Journal · doi:10.1155/2016/7830785 · Cited by 19
“The adequacy of the matching procedure was checked using graphical visualizations of the propensity score distribution; the quality of the balance in the matched groups was examined through the standardized difference of means of each covariate [36, 37].”
MethodImpact of public intervention on micro and small enterprises performance in Ethiopia
Yonis, M. B., Woldehanna, T., & Amha, W. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-10-2016-0259 · Cited by 20
Living with observational data in biological anthropology
Smith, R. J. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23862 · Cited by 16
Metformin reduces risk of varicose veins in patients with type 2 diabetes
Tseng, C. (2019) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3206 · Cited by 15
“5 and 2 are considered to indicate sufficient balance between the two groups.(16) Cumulative duration of metformin therapy was calculated and expressed in months.”
BackgroundDifferences in cognitive performance between informal caregivers and non-caregivers
Falzarano, F. B., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2020) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2020.1749228 · Cited by 18
“According to Rubin (2001), standardized mean differences in propensity scores should be close to zero (d Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn.”
BackgroundGreene, M. C., Heise, L., Musci, R. J., Wirtz, A. L., Johnson, R. M., Leoutsakos, J., Wainberg, M. L., & Tol, W. A. (2020) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043433 · Cited by 15
Lan, B., & Srinivasan, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198120953778 · Cited by 15
Lin, S., He, W., & Zeng, M. (2020) · Journal of Inflammation Research · doi:10.2147/jir.s287510 · Cited by 15
Suk, Y., & Kang, H. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09805-x · Cited by 13
“1 standard deviation and the variance ratio lies between 4/5 and 5/4, we can achieve good balance of the covariates (Rubin, 2001; Shadish, Clark, & Steiner, 2008; Steiner, Cook, Shadish, & Clark, 2010) .”
BackgroundInfluentialJohara, F. T., Benedetti, A., Platt, R. W., Menzies, D., Viiklepp, P., Schaaf, H. S., & Chan, E. D. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01452-1 · Cited by 15
Switkowski, K. M., Aris, I. M., Gingras, V., Oken, E., & Young, J. G. (2022) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqac003 · Cited by 15
Ellis, A. R., Dusetzina, S. B., Hansen, R. A., Gaynes, B. N., Farley, J. F., & Stürmer, T. (2012) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.3396 · Cited by 15
Sharif‐Askari, F. S., Sulaiman, S. A. S., Sharif‐Askari, N. S., Hussain, A. A. S., & Railey, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106517 · Cited by 15
“Because anticoagulant users may differ in key baseline characteristics from those of non-users, and to allow for an unbiased comparison between these two groups, a propensity score-matching was performed [15,16].”
BackgroundImproving Middle School Quality in Poor Countries
McEwan, P. J., Murphy-Graham, E. E., Irribarra, D. T., Aguilar, C. R., & Rápalo, R. (2014) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373714527786 · Cited by 16
“25 standard deviations for 24 variables, the threshold at which regression adjustment is especially sensitive to specification (Imbens & Wooldridge, 2008; Rubin, 2001; Stuart, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialCovariate Balance in Bayesian Propensity Score Approaches for Observational Studies
Chen, J., & Kaplan, D. E. (2014) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.911396 · Cited by 15
“According to the balance criteria presented in Rubin (2001), variance ratios for most of the covariates in the treatment group and control group fall in the acceptable range (between 1/2 and 2) except for a few levels of categorical covariates.”
MethodMassoullié, G., Chenaf, C., Mulliez, A., Rossignol, P., Ploux, S., Pereira, B., Reuillard, A., Jean, F., Andronache, M., Eschalier, A., et al. (2018) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.013 · Cited by 15
Lu, N. T., Xu, Y., & Yue, L. Q. (2019) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2019.1632880 · Cited by 15
“Such an approach includes two phases: study design and outcome analysis (Rubin 2001, 2007, 2008).”
MethodAssessing the impact of a minimum income scheme: the Basque Country case
de la Rica, S., & Gorjón, L. (2019) · SERIEs · doi:10.1007/s13209-019-00203-2 · Cited by 15
“…treatment effects using observational data since they enable observational studies to be designed along lines similar to randomised experiments (Rubin 2001).12 Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) show that instead of conditioning on the covariates, conditioning on the probability of potential treatment…”
MethodZogovic, S., Bojesen, A. B., Andos, S., & Mortensen, F. V. (2019) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.017 · Cited by 15
Hypokalaemia and Outcomes in Older Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure
Valentová, M., Patel, S. S., Lam, P. H., Faselis, C. J., Arundel, C., Fonarow, G. C., Cheng, Y., Allman, R. M., von Haehling, S., Anker, S. D., et al. (2020) · ESC Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ehf2.12666 · Cited by 15
Fortini, R. M., Braga, M. J., & de Freitas, C. O. (2020) · Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural · doi:10.1590/1806-9479.2020.199479 · Cited by 19
van den Bogaart, E. H. A., Kroese, M., Spreeuwenberg, M. D., Ruwaard, D., & Tsiachristas, A. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.014 · Cited by 15
Conover, M. M., Ryan, P. B., Chen, Y., Suchard, M. A., Hripcsak, G. M., & Schuemie, M. J. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae317 · Cited by 14
Not in my backyard? The local impact of wind and solar parks in Brazil
Scheifele, F., & Popp, D. C. (2025) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108481 · Cited by 14
Controlling Shareholders' Tax Incentives and Classification Shifting*
Chung, H., Choi, S., & Jung, W. (2020) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12654 · Cited by 14
Family changes and the willingness to take risks
Browne, M. J., Jäger, V., Richter, A., & Steinorth, P. (2021) · Journal of Risk & Insurance · doi:10.1111/jori.12341 · Cited by 25
“We find that the matching performs sufficiently well for all considered life events with standardized biases well below the acceptable thresholds as discussed in Rubin (2001). The potential disadvantages of matching are that we can only observe one treatment (in our case the treatments are the life events) at a time.”
BackgroundTorregrossa, G., Sá, M. P., den Eynde, J. V., Sicouri, S., Wertan, M. C., Ramlawi, B., & Sutter, F. P. (2021) · Journal of Cardiac Surgery · doi:10.1111/jocs.16146 · Cited by 14
“25 was considered an indicator of good balance between groups.(11) For the matched cohort (After Matching), data were again presented as described above.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubin, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rubin, Donald B.
- ORCID
- Rubin, Donald B.
- Venue
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 169-188
- ISSN
- 1387-3741 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9400
- OpenAlex
- W2597503617
- Cited by
- 2,228
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 174 · 2025: 193 · 2024: 196 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 166 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 163 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- propensity score, observational study design, covariate balance, matching, subclassification, weighting, diagnostic tables, treatment effect estimation, tobacco litigation, National Medical Expenditure Survey, causal inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review