Cited by 345Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPsychology and Mental Health

Are discrepancies among child, mother, and father reports on children's behavior related to parents' psychological symptoms and aspects of parent–child relationships?

Treutler, Christina M., Epkins, Catherine C.·2003·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Examined whether parents' symptoms and qualitative and quantitative aspects of parent-child relationships make unique contributions to mothers' and fathers' reports of, and mother-child, father-child, and father-mother discrepancies on, children's behavior. Participants were 100 children, aged 10-12, and their mothers and fathers. Parents' symptoms and parent-child relationships made unique contributions to both parents' ratings of externalizing behavior. Although parent-child relationship variables were related to both parents' ratings of internalizing behavior, only parents' symptoms made unique contributions. On mother-child and father-child discrepancies, differences emerged between mother and father, and internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Both fathers' and mothers' symptoms contributed to father-mother discrepancies on both behavior types, with parent-child relationships contributing unique variance to discrepancies on internalizing behavior. Results highlight the importance of each informant's symptoms and relationship variables in understanding informant discrepancies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021765114434

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parent self-report measures may introduce subjective bias because fathers' depressive symptoms can affect how they perceive the father-child relationship and their child's problem behaviours.

    “These self-report measures may introduce subjective bias as cognitive-affective aspects of paternal depressive symptoms may impact on fathers' perceptions of both the father-child relationship and their child's problem behaviours (Treutler & Epkins, 2003).”

    From The effects of paternal depression on child and adolescent outcomes: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Treutler & Epkins, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treutler, C. M., & Epkins, C. C.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Epkins, Catherine C.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2003-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
13-27
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W226740661
Cited by
344
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
informant discrepancies, parent-child relationship, child behavior, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, mothers, fathers
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Father-Child Relations, Fathers, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review