Cited by 62Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The efficacy of involuntary outpatient treatment in Massachusetts

Geller, Jeffrey, Grudzinskas, Albert J., McDermeit, Melissa, Fisher, William H., Lawlor, Ted·1998·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

One means to address some of the unintended consequences of the shift of treatment for individuals with serious mental illness from hospitals to communities has been involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT). Using Massachusetts data, 19 patients with court orders for IOT were matched to all and to best fits on demographic and clinical variables, and then to individuals with the closest fit on utilization before the IOT date. Outcomes indicated the IOT group had significantly fewer admissions and hospital days after the court order. The full impact of IOT requires more study, particularly directed toward IOT's effects on insight and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022239322212

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even when studies have used control groups, it is difficult to know whether to attribute any improvement to compulsory community treatment or to the non-specific effects of increased contact with healthcare professionals.

    “However, even when studies have used control groups, it is difficult to know whether to attribute any improvement to CCT, or to the non-specific effects of increased contact with healthcare professionals (Swartz 1995; Torrey 1995; Geller 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geller, J., Grudzinskas, A. J., McDermeit, M., Fisher, W. H., & Lawlor, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Chestnut Health Systems (US)
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
1998-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
271-285
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W1587931337
Cited by
61
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
involuntary outpatient treatment, court-ordered treatment, severe mental illness, deinstitutionalization, hospitalization, length of hospital stay, community mental health services, Massachusetts
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Massachusetts, Patient Admission, Quality of Life, Program Evaluation, Matched-Pair Analysis, Mental Competency, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review