Cited by 56Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Effects of Legal Mechanisms on Perceived Coercion and Treatment Adherence Among Persons with Severe Mental Illness

Elbogen, Eric B., Swanson, Jeffrey W., Swartz, Marvin S.·2003·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study takes preliminary steps to examine the effects of 2 legal mechanisms-outpatient commitment (OPC) and representative payeeship (rep payee)-on perceived coercion and treatment adherence in persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Data were collected in structured interviews from 258 involuntarily-admitted inpatients with SMI who were followed for 1 year after discharge. Subjects' clinicians and family members were also interviewed. The analyses show that subjects with both OPC and a rep payee perceived their mental health treatment to be significantly more coercive than subjects who did not receive these legal interventions. Duration of OPC and having a newly-appointed rep payee were both significantly associated with increased treatment adherence over the course of 1 year. For treatment-adherent subjects, neither form of legal mechanism was associated with perceived coercion in treatment, whereas subjects who were nonadherent perceived legal mechanisms as significantly more coercive. The data suggest that these legal tools both affect adherence to treatment, but when used together significantly increase the perceived coerciveness of treatment. Questions remain concerning the underlying mechanism of these effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nmd.0000092195.22555.12

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elbogen, E. B., Swanson, J. W., & Swartz, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2003-10
Volume
191
Issue
10
Pages
629-637
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041496862
Cited by
56
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh048103-08, 5p50mh051410-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH48103, MH51410)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
outpatient commitment, perceived coercion, medication adherence, severe mental illness, involuntary psychiatric admission, legal mechanisms, family involvement in treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Perception, Confidence Intervals, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review