The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,737
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,278
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,180
Multiple regression in behavioral research
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,919
Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 2,726
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092239 · Cited by 2,553
Computational Handbook of Statistics.
Crofts, A. E., Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1969) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283756 · Cited by 2,323
Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1
BLUM-KULKA, S., & OLSHTAIN, E. (1984) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/5.3.196 · Cited by 1,242
Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies
Kuhn, E. D., Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415556 · Cited by 1,139
Cited by
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6 · Cited by 345
Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.04.002 · Cited by 300
Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147 · Cited by 202
Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment
Schoenebeck, S., Haimson, O. L., & Nakamura, L. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820913122 · Cited by 84
Trust repair in human-agent teams: the effectiveness of explanations and expressing regret
Kox, E. S., Kerstholt, J. H., Hueting, T. F., & de Vries, P. W. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-021-09515-9 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-140
- ISSN
- 0090-6905 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6555
- OpenAlex
- W1518839662
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1025068306386
- The paper
- Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1025068306386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
