Cited by 1,242Linguistics and Language AnalysisLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1

BLUM-KULKA, S., OLSHTAIN, E.·1984·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

SHOSHANA BLUM-KULKA, ELITE OLSHTAIN; Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)1, Applied Linguistics, Volu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/5.3.196

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLUM-KULKA, S., & OLSHTAIN, E.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
1984-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
196-213
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2009497647
Cited by
1,242
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 40
FWCI
42.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
requests, apology, speech act realization, cross-cultural pragmatics, politeness, speech acts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review