CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Placating the Powerless: Effects of Legitimate and Illegitimate Explanation on Affect, Memory, and Stereotyping

Haines, Elizabeth L., Jost, John T.·2000·Social Justice Research
DOI 10.1023/a:1026481205719
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026481205719

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bies, R. J., and Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Explanation as legitimation: Excuse-making in organizations. In McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., and Read, S. J. (eds.), Explaining One's Self to Others: Reason-giving in a Social Context, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
  2. Jost, J. T., and Major, B. (eds.) (in press). The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Haines, Elizabeth L.
ORCID
Venue
Social Justice Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
219-236
ISSN
  • 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6725
DOI
10.1023/a:1026481205719
OpenAlex
W2270402524
Cited by
120
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Social Justice Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
City University of New York
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
power differences, system justification theory, intergroup behavior, stereotyping, affect, memory bias, powerlessness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review