Cited by 250Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Climate Change on Wildfire Severity: A Regional Forecast for Northern California

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:clim.0000024667.89579.ed

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF): 1990, The Effects of Continued Reduction in CDF Wildland Protection Resources-Is the State Facing Unacceptable Wildfire Risks, Emergency Fire Suppression Costs, and Resource and Environmental Damage? A White Paper Prepared for the Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program (FRRAP) by the Ad Hoc Committee on Budget Reductions, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA.
  2. California State Board of Forestry: 1996, California Fire Plan-A Framework for Minimizing Costs and Losses from Wildland Fires, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA.
  3. Dimitrakopoulos, A.: 1985, An Evaluation of the National Fire Management Analysis System's Initial Attack Analysis Processor, M.S. Thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.
  4. Fried, J. S., Gilless, J. K., and Martin, R. E.: 1987, 'CFES-The California Fire Economics Simulator: A Computerized System forWildland Fire Protection Planning', in Proceedings, Symposium on Wildland Fire 2000, April 27-30, South Lake Tahoe, CA, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-101, pp. 212–217.
  5. Fried, J. S. and Gilless, J. K.: 1988a, The California Fire Economics Simulator Initial Attack Module (CFES-IAM): MS-DOS Version 1.11 User's Guide, Bulletin 1925, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, California, 84 pp.
  6. Fried, J. S. and Gilless, J. K.: 1993, 'Simulating Initial Attack: Stochastic Formulation Brings Risk Consideration to Fire Protection Planning', in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Systems Analysis and Management Decisions in Forestry, Valdivia, Chile, March 8-12, 1993, pp. 76–94.
  7. Gilless, J. K. and Fried, J. S.: 1991, 'Implementation of a Wildland Fire Protection Planning System by a State Resource Management Agency: Simulation Proves more Useful than Optimization', in Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, Charleston, South Carolina, March 3-7, 1991, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-74, pp. 312–319.
  8. Peara, A. and Mills. E.: 1999, 'Climate for Change: An Actuarial Perspective on GlobalWarming and its Potential Impact on Insurers', Contingencies: Journal of the American Academy of Actuaries (January/February), pp. 16–23.
  9. Simard, A. J. and Main, W. A.: 1987, 'Global Climate Change: The Potential for Changes inWildland Fire Activity in the Southeast', in Meo, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Climate Change in the Southeastern United States: Future Impacts and Present Policy Issues (May 28-29, 1987 New Orleans, Louisiana).
  10. Spero, J.: 1998a, Will an Additional Engine at Moraga Improve Wildland Fire Suppression? California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Sacramento, CA, 19 pp.
  11. Spero, J.: 1998b, Will Moving an Engine from San Antonio Station to Another Station Improve Wildland Fire Suppression?, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Sacramento, CA, 15 pp.
  12. Swiss Re: 1992, Fire of the Future, Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich.
  13. Westman, W. E. and Malanson, G. P.: 1992, 'Effects of Climate Change on Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems in California and Baja California', in Peters, R. L. and Lovejoy, T. (eds.), Global Warming and Biological Diversity, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fried, J. S., Torn, M. S., & Mills, E.
Affiliations
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2004-05
Volume
64
Issue
1-2
Pages
169-191
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2141992362
Cited by
250
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
climate change impacts, wildfire severity, fire spread, fire suppression effectiveness, burned area, fire return interval, general circulation model projections, Northern California, Sierra Nevada, San Francisco Bay Area, vegetation distribution, carbon storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review