CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effectiveness of Mindfulness Training on the Grieving Process and Emotional Well-Being of Chronic Pain Patients

Sagula, David, Rice, Kenneth G.·2004·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
DOI 10.1023/b:jocs.0000045353.78755.51
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jocs.0000045353.78755.51

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to embodied yoga and meditation practices, top-down CBT techniques, such as cognitive reappraisal, possibly instill a sense of fighting or resisting the pain.

    “Compared to embodied yoga and meditation practices, top-down CBT techniques, such as cognitive reappraisal (i.e., challenging the initial reactive interpretation of distressing stimuli), possibly instill a sense of fighting or resisting the pain [48].”

    From Yoga is effective for treating chronic pain in veterans with Gulf War Illness at long-term follow-up (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Beck, A. T., & Weishaer, M. E. (1989). Cognitive therapy. In R. J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current psychotherapy (4th ed., pp. 285–320). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
  2. Levine, S. (1994). Healing and dying [Film]. Hartford, CT: NewWay Productions.
  3. Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of boarderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Mooney, R. L., & Gordon, L. V. (1950). The Mooneyproblem check-lists adult form. New York: Psychological Corp.
  5. Schneider, J. (2000). The overdiagnosis of depression: Recognizing grief and its transformative potential. Traverse City, MI: Seasons Press.
  6. Schneider, J., & Deutsch, D. (1997). Understanding the transformative potential of grief: Construct validation of the Response to Loss Inventory. Traverse City, MI: Seasons Press.
  7. Speilberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
  8. Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch R., & Lushene, R. (1970). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Sagula, D., & Rice, K. G.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rice, Kenneth G.
ORCID
Rice, Kenneth G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
333-342
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
DOI
10.1023/b:jocs.0000045353.78755.51
OpenAlex
W2169001500
Cited by
82
References
26
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
Funders
Michigan State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, grief, chronic pain, bereavement, emotional well-being, depression, anxiety, Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, pain clinic patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review