Cited by 164Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Mindfulness of movement as a coping strategy in multiple sclerosis

Mills, Nigel, Allen, Janet·2000·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of a short course of mindfulness of movement to help with symptom management in eight people with multiple sclerosis. Progress was compared to a control group who were asked to continue with their current care. Each participant received six individual one-to-one sessions of instruction. They were also provided with audio and videotape aides. Each participant was assessed on a test of balance, pre- and post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. All participants completed a rating of change of 22 symptoms relevant to multiple sclerosis. A close relative or friend was also asked to assess independently the degree of change. The mindfulness group reported improvement over a broad range of symptoms. This was verified by the relatives' independent rating and maintained at 3 month follow-up. The control group showed no improvement but instead tended towards a deterioration on many of the items. The physical assessment of balance also showed a significant improvement for the mindfulness group. This improvement was maintained at 3 month follow-up. In conclusion, training in mindfulness of movement appeared to result in improved symptom management for this group of people with multiple sclerosis. This was a pilot study, using small numbers, so the results need to be treated with caution. Several improvements to the experimental design are suggested. The role of individual therapeutic ingredients is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-8343(00)00100-6

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, N., & Allen, J.
Affiliations
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Mills, Nigel
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
425-431
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021945047
Cited by
164
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, symptom management, balance, personalized treatment, symptom rating, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Awareness, Breathing Exercises, Postural Balance, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Martial Arts, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review