Cited by 1,218Ethics and Social Impacts of AILiterary and Philosophical StudiesPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Morality of Artificial Agents

Floridi, Luciano, Sanders, J.W.·2004·Minds and Machines

DOI 10.1023/b:mind.0000035461.63578.9d

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:mind.0000035461.63578.9d

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,178
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Genetic Algorithms
Goldberg, D. E., & Shakespeare, W. (2002) · Cited by 16,088
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290
Genetic Algorithms in Search
Goldberg, D. E. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,109
Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950)
Turing, A. M. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250791.003.0017 · Cited by 6,120
Randomized Algorithms
Motwani, R., & Raghavan, P. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814075 · Cited by 5,098
Is It an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents
Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0013570 · Cited by 2,286
Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics
Floridi, L. (1999) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1010018611096 · Cited by 453
Self-citation
Finite transition systems
Arnold, A., & Plaice, J. (1994) · Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd. eBooks · Cited by 433

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

4 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

Bedau, M.A. (1996) 'The Nature of Life', in M.A. Boden, ed., The Philosophy of Life, Oxford University Press, pp. 332–357.
Dennet, D. (1997), When HAL Kills, Who's to Blame?' in D. Stork, ed., HAL's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 351–365.
Dixon, B.A. (1995), 'Response: Evil and the Moral Agency of Animals', Between the Species 11(1-2), pp. 38–40.
Kerr, P. (1996), The Grid, New York: Warner Books.
Michie, D. (1961), 'Trial and Error', in A. Garratt, ed., Penguin Science Surveys, Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 129–145.
Mitchell, T.M. (1997), Machine Learning, McGraw Hill.
Rosenfeld, R. (1995a), 'Can Animals Be Evil?: Kekes' Character-Morality, the Hard Reaction to Evil, and Animals, Between the Species 11(1-2), pp. 33–38.
Rosenfeld, R. (1995b), 'Reply', Between the Species 11(1-2), pp. 40–41.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,003

Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization
ALFANO, M., CARTER, J. A., & CHEONG, M. (2018) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2018.27 · Cited by 89
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE'S NEW FRONTIER: ARTIFICIAL COMPANIONS AND THE FOURTH REVOLUTION
Floridi, L. (2008) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00573.x · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Beyond the skin bag: on the moral responsibility of extended agencies
Hanson, F. A. (2009) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9184-z · Cited by 87
On the moral status of social robots: considering the consciousness criterion
Mosakas, K. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01002-1 · Cited by 87
Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society, and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence
van de Poel, I. (2020) · Human Affairs · doi:10.1515/humaff-2020-0042 · Cited by 84
Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility
Schulzke, M. (2012) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0089-0 · Cited by 83
Artificial Morality. Concepts, Issues and Challenges
Misselhorn, C. (2018) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-018-0229-y · Cited by 83
Making moral machines: why we need artificial moral agents
Formosa, P., & Ryan, M. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01089-6 · Cited by 82
A taxonomy of human–machine collaboration: capturing automation and technical autonomy
Simmler, M., & Frischknecht, R. (2020) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-01004-z · Cited by 81
AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2019) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0781-9 · Cited by 79
Transparency as design publicity: explaining and justifying inscrutable algorithms
Loi, M., Ferrario, A., & Viganò, E. (2021) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09564-w · Cited by 79
Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence in National Defence
Taddeo, M., McNeish, D., Blanchard, A., & Edgar, E. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00482-3 · Cited by 79
Sympathy for Dolores: Moral Consideration for Robots Based on Virtue and Recognition
Cappuccio, M. L., Peeters, A., & McDonald, W. P. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-0341-y · Cited by 79
When Doctors and AI Interact: on Human Responsibility for Artificial Risks
Verdicchio, M., & Perin, A. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00506-6 · Cited by 79
A Theory of Social Agency for Human-Robot Interaction
Jackson, R. B., & Williams, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.687726 · Cited by 76
AI Systems Under Criminal Law: a Legal Analysis and a Regulatory Perspective
Lagioia, F., & Sartor, G. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00362-x · Cited by 75
Implementable Ethics for Autonomous Vehicles
Gerdes, J. C., & Thornton, S. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_5 · Cited by 75
Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents
Stahl, B. C. (2003) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1023/b:mind.0000005136.61217.93 · Cited by 75
The ethics of designing artificial agents
Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K., & Wolf, M. J. (2008) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9163-9 · Cited by 74
Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence
Owe, A., & Baum, S. D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00065-0 · Cited by 73
LIS as Applied Philosophy of Information: A Reappraisal
Floridi, L. (2004) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3858704 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Responsible epistemic technologies: A social-epistemological analysis of autocompleted web search
Miller, B., & Record, I. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816644805 · Cited by 73
Robots in the cloud with privacy: A new threat to data protection?
Pagallo, U. (2013) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.012 · Cited by 73
The risks of autonomous machines: from responsibility gaps to control gaps
Hindriks, F., & Veluwenkamp, H. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-04001-5 · Cited by 71
Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics
Cave, S., Nyrup, R., Vold, K., & Weller, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2865996 · Cited by 71
Imagining a non-biological machine as a legal person
Calverley, D. J. (2007) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0092-7 · Cited by 69
Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence
Green, B. P. (2018) · Scientia et Fides · doi:10.12775/setf.2018.015 · Cited by 68
Can artificial intelligences be moral agents?
Brożek, B., & Janik, B. (2019) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.002 · Cited by 68
Digital hermeneutics: from interpreting with machines to interpretational machines
Romele, A., Severo, M., & Furia, P. (2018) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2 · Cited by 69
Museums in the Infosphere: reshaping value creation
Simone, C., Cerquetti, M., & Sala, A. L. (2021) · Museum Management and Curatorship · doi:10.1080/09647775.2021.1914140 · Cited by 68
RoboWarfare: can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield?
Sullins, J. P. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9241-7 · Cited by 68
Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
Coeckelbergh, M. (2018) · Kairos · doi:10.2478/kjps-2018-0007 · Cited by 68
The GenAI Future of Consumer Research
Huang, M., & Rust, R. T. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaf013 · Cited by 67
Morality in a Technological World: Knowledge as Duty
Magnani, L. (2007) · Cited by 67
Digital loneliness—changes of social recognition through AI companions
Jacobs, K. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1281037 · Cited by 48
Relationship Between Trust in the AI Creator and Trust in AI Systems: The Crucial Role of AI Alignment and Steerability
Saffarizadeh, K., Keil, M., & Maruping, L. M. (2024) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2024.2376382 · Cited by 65
On Floridi’s metaphysical foundation of information ecology
Capurro, R. (2008) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9162-x · Cited by 65
Hyperhistory and the Philosophy of Information Policies
Floridi, L. (2012) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0077-4 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Making sense of the conceptual nonsense ‘trustworthy AI’
Freiman, O. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00241-w · Cited by 64
Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible
Tigard, D. W. (2021) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180120000985 · Cited by 63
A method for integrating ethics into the design of robots
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/ir-12-2012-451 · Cited by 63
Supporting and challenging learners through pedagogical agents: Addressing ethical issues through designing for values
Richards, D., & Dignum, V. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12863 · Cited by 63
Scarecrows in Oz: The Use of Large Language Models in HRI
Williams, T., Matuszek, C., Mead, R., & DePalma, N. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3606261 · Cited by 63
Moral Status and Intelligent Robots
Gordon, J., & Gunkel, D. J. (2021) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12450 · Cited by 62
Algorithmic memory and the right to be forgotten on the web
Esposito, E. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717703996 · Cited by 61
Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe
Nagenborg, M., Capurro, R., Weber, J., & Pingel, C. (2007) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0153-y · Cited by 61
What do academics say about artificial intelligence ethics? An overview of the scholarship
Bakiner, O. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00182-4 · Cited by 29
The issue of moral consideration in robot ethics
Gerdes, A. (2016) · ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society · doi:10.1145/2874239.2874278 · Cited by 60
Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy: On the Ethical Dimension of Recommender Systems
Bonicalzi, S., De, M., & Giovanola, B. (2023) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-023-09922-5 · Cited by 59
Can Social Robots Qualify for Moral Consideration? Reframing the Question about Robot Rights
Tavani, H. T. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9040073 · Cited by 59
Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies
van de Poel, I., Frank, L. E., Hermann, J., Hopster, J. K. G., Lenzi, D., Nyholm, S. R., Taebi, B., & Ziliotti, E. (2023) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0366 · Cited by 58
Digging into the Accountability Gap: Operator’s Civil Liability in Healthcare AI-systems
Prifti, K., Stamhuis, E. F., & Heine, K. (2022) · Information technology and law series/Information technology & law series · doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_15 · Cited by 58
From Pluralistic Normative Principles to Autonomous-Agent Rules
Townsend, B., Paterson, C., Arvind, T., Nemirovsky, G., Călinescu, R., Cavalcanti, A., Habli, I., & Thomas, A. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-022-09614-w · Cited by 60
The Legal Status Of Artificial Intelligence And The Violation Of Human Rights
Nuredin, A. (2023) · International Scientific Journal Sui Generis · doi:10.55843/sg2321007n · Cited by 58
The Cambridge history of philosophy, 1870-1945
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-0223 · Cited by 58
Against the moral Turing test: accountable design and the moral reasoning of autonomous systems
Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. J. (2016) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9389-x · Cited by 57
What do we owe to intelligent robots?
Gordon, J. (2018) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0844-6 · Cited by 57
The Retribution-Gap and Responsibility-Loci Related to Robots and Automated Technologies: A Reply to Nyholm
de Jong, R. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00120-4 · Cited by 56
Should We Treat Teddy Bear 2.0 as a Kantian Dog? Four Arguments for the Indirect Moral Standing of Personal Social Robots, with Implications for Thinking About Animals and Humans
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09554-3 · Cited by 56
Can Robotic AI Systems Be Virtuous and Why Does This Matter?
Constantinescu, M., & Crisp, R. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00887-w · Cited by 44
Responsible computers? A case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency
Stahl, B. C. (2006) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9112-4 · Cited by 55
Ethics for AI Writing
McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375811 · Cited by 54
Developing artificial agents worthy of trust: “Would you buy a used car from this artificial agent?”
Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K., & Wolf, M. J. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9255-1 · Cited by 54
Floridi’s ontological theory of informational privacy: Some implications and challenges
Tavani, H. T. (2008) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9154-x · Cited by 53
Just Information Warfare
Taddeo, M. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9245-8 · Cited by 53
The Challenge of Value Alignment: From Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety
Gabriel, I., & Ghazavi, V. (2022) · Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.18 · Cited by 52
Can we program or train robots to be good?
SHARKEY, A. J. C. (2017) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-017-9425-5 · Cited by 52
Artificial Moral Cognition: Moral Functionalism and Autonomous Moral Agency
Howard, D. A., & Muntean, I. L. (2017) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61043-6_7 · Cited by 51
Building Moral Robots: Ethical Pitfalls and Challenges
Gordon, J. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00084-5 · Cited by 51
Why a Virtual Assistant for Moral Enhancement When We Could have a Socrates?
Lara, F. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00318-5 · Cited by 51
Beyond External Constraints: The Missing Dimension of AI GovernancePreprint
CHEN, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6449738 · Cited by 51
Implementing moral decision making faculties in computers and robots
Wallach, W. (2007) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-007-0093-6 · Cited by 50
Artificial intelligence and African conceptions of personhood
Wareham, C. S. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09541-3 · Cited by 50
From Moral Agents to Moral Factors: The Structural Ethics Approach
Brey, P. A. E. (2013) · Philosophy of engineering and technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_8 · Cited by 49
Computer Science Security Research and Human Subjects: Emerging Considerations for Research Ethics Boards
Buchanan, E., Aycock, J., Dexter, S., Dittrich, D., & Hvizdak, E. (2011) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.71 · Cited by 49
Ethical protocols design
Turilli, M. (2007) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9128-9 · Cited by 48
Learning How to Behave
Malle, B. F., & Scheutz, M. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-17483-5_17 · Cited by 48
Artificial virtuous agents: from theory to machine implementation
Stenseke, J. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01325-7 · Cited by 48
On Corporate Virtue
Gowri, A. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9117-2 · Cited by 48
Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies
Hew, P. C. (2014) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9345-6 · Cited by 48
Social Robotics and the Good Life
(2022) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.1515/9783839462652 · Cited by 47
Sharing responsibility with a machine
Kirchkamp, O., & Strobel, C. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.02.010 · Cited by 46
Designing Virtuous Sex Robots
Peeters, A., & Haselager, P. (2019) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00592-1 · Cited by 46
Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Popa, E. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00483-2 · Cited by 45
Ethical, legal, social, and economic (ELSE) implications of artificial intelligence at a global level: a scientometrics approach
Benefo, E. O., Tingler, A., White, M., Cover, J. D., Torres, L., Broussard, C., Shirmohammadi, A., Pradhan, A. K., & Patra, D. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00124-6 · Cited by 45
Research and innovation processes revisited – networked responsibility in industry
Timmermans, J., Yaghmaei, E., Stahl, B. C., & Brem, A. (2017) · Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-04-2015-0023 · Cited by 45
Artificial moral agents: moral mentors or sensible tools?
Fossa, F. (2018) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9451-y · Cited by 45
Verantwortung und Roboterethik
Loh, J. (2018) · Ethik in mediatisierten Welten · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21083-0_6 · Cited by 44
The Minds We Make: A Philosophical Inquiry into Theory of Mind and Artificial Intelligence
Yıldız, T. (2025) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-024-09876-2 · Cited by 44
Modelling ethical rules of lying with Answer Set Programming
Ganascia, J. (2007) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9134-y · Cited by 44
Distributive Justice and Co-Operation in a World of Humans and Non-Humans: A Contractarian Argument for Drawing Non-Humans into the Sphere of Justice
Coeckelbergh, M. (2009) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-009-9080-8 · Cited by 44
Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems
Heersmink, R. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9802-1 · Cited by 43
Tay is you. The attribution of responsibility in the algorithmic culture.
Suárez-Gonzalo, S., Manchón, L. M., & Guerrero-Solé, F. (2019) · Observatorio (OBS*) · doi:10.15847/obsobs13220191432 · Cited by 43
What a Vision: The Artificial Companion. A Piece of Vision Assessment Including an Expert Survey
Böhle, K., & Bopp, K. (2013) · Cited by 43
Moral agency without responsibility? Analysis of three ethical models of human-computer interaction in times of artificial intelligence (AI)
Fritz, A., Brandt, W., Gimpel, H., & Bayer, S. (2020) · De Ethica A Journal of Philosophical Theological and Applied Ethics · doi:10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.20613 · Cited by 43
Who Needs Stories if You Can Get the Data? ISPs in the Era of Big Number Crunching
Hildebrandt, M. (2011) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0041-8 · Cited by 43
Philosophy of Linguistics
Scholz, B. C. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00142 · Cited by 43
The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan: a comparative analysis
Matsuzaki, H., & Lindemann, G. (2015) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0630-7 · Cited by 42
Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended
Waelbers, K. (2008) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x · Cited by 42
Mathematics, ethics and purism: an application of MacIntyre’s virtue theory
Ernest, P. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02928-1 · Cited by 41

Authors: Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W.
Affiliations: University of Oxford (GB)
ORCID: Floridi, Luciano
Venue: Minds and Machines
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2004-08
Volume: 14
Issue: 3
Pages: 349-379
ISSN: 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
1572-8641
DOI: 10.1023/b:mind.0000035461.63578.9d
OpenAlex: W2094251476
Cited by: 1,218
References: 33
Citations by year: 2026: 147 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI: 45.58
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
Locations: Minds and Machines (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Social Sciences › Law › Literary and Philosophical Studies
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords: artificial agents, moral agency, moral patients, computer ethics, levels of abstraction, autonomy, interactivity, adaptability, moral responsibility, free will, digital systems, cyberspace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

On the Morality of Artificial Agents

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks