The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“People tend to observe their own behavior and use it to infer their own values and preferences (Bem, 1972).”
BackgroundBower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“Recent research on automatic goal activation has shown that goals can be activated, pursued, and fulfilled without people being consciously aware of the goal at all (Barghet al., 2001; Bargh and Chartrand, 1999; Chartrand and Bargh, 1996).”
BackgroundIntegration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 3×
“The dominance of automatic processes stems not only from their tendency to be first on the scene, but also from the powerful influence they exert on controlled processes (Bargh, 1989; Epstein, 1994; Epsteinet al., 1992).”
BackgroundThe psychology of social impact
Latané, B. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.4.343 · Cited by 2,864
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 2×
“Acceptance of unethical behavior can increase with time, much as people are prone to escalate their commitment to previously chosen courses of action (Glover, 2000; Lifton, 2000; Loewenstein, 1996; Staw, 1976; Staw and Ross, 1989).”
BackgroundHeart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209563 · Cited by 2,044
Cited by
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017103 · Cited by 1,690
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11467 · Cited by 1,334
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G.
- Venue
- Social Justice Research
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-202
- ISSN
- 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6725
- OpenAlex
- W2117255728
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/b:sore.0000027409.88372.b4
- The paper
- Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Asore.0000027409.88372.b4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
