Cited by 272Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective

Renkl, Alexander, Atkinson, Robert K., Große, Cornelia S.·2004·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:truc.0000021815.74806.f6

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Renkl, Alexander
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2004-01
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Pages
59-82
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2148119838
Cited by
272
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
worked examples, cognitive load, self-explanation, computer-based learning environments, think-aloud, skill acquisition, problem solving, learning events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review