Cited by 91Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingSchool Health and Nursing Education

The Implementation and effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program in Finland

Salmivalli, Christina, Poskiparta, Elisa, Ahtola, Annarilla, Haataja, Anne·2013·European Psychologist

Abstract

Bullying is a widespread problem in schools and communities around the world, and nationwide initiatives to prevent and reduce it have begun to emerge in European countries. In Finland, the effects of the national antibullying program, KiVa, have been evaluated first in a randomized controlled trial (2007–2009) and then during nationwide rollout across schools (since 2009). The KiVa program has been found to reduce bullying and victimization, while it increases empathy toward victimized peers and self-efficacy to defend them. Moreover, the program has produced reductions in reinforcement of the bullies’ behavior. Finally, KiVa has been found to increase school liking and school motivation, whereas it has led to significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and negative peer perceptions among children and youth. The uptake of the program by Finnish schools has been remarkable, as 90% of the comprehensive schools are at present implementing KiVa. The paper describes the development of the KiVa program, evaluation of its effects, and its implementation across Finnish schools. Challenges in sustainability and high-level implementation of the program are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1016-9040/a000140

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been some successful bullying prevention programmes worldwide for traditional bullying, such as the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program and the KiVa anti-bullying programme.

    “For traditional bullying, there have been some successful bullying prevention programmes worldwide such as the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP) and the KiVa anti-bullying programme (Salmivalli et al., 2013).”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Salmivalli et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmivalli, C., Poskiparta, E., Ahtola, A., & Haataja, A.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Venue
European Psychologist
Published
2013-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
79-88
ISSN
  • 1016-9040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-531X
OpenAlex
W2142376831
Cited by
91
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
KiVa program, bullying prevention programs, bullying prevention, school bullying, victimization, empathy toward victims, self-efficacy, school liking, academic motivation, anxiety and depression, peer perception, program implementation, program sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review