Cited by 219Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Effects of the KiVa Anti-bullying Program on Adolescents’ Depression, Anxiety, and Perception of Peers

Williford, Anne, Boulton, Aaron, Noland, Brian, Little, Todd D., Kärnä, Antti, Salmivalli, Christina·2012·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the KiVa antibullying program on students' anxiety, depression, and perception of peers in Grades 4-6. Furthermore, it was investigated whether reductions in peer-reported victimization predicted changes in these outcome variables. The study participants included 7,741 students from 78 schools who were randomly assigned to either intervention or control condition, and the program effects were tested with structural equation modeling. A cross-lagged panel model suggested that the KiVa program is effective for reducing students' internalizing problems and improving their peer-group perceptions. Finally, changes in anxiety, depression, and positive peer perceptions were found to be predicted by reductions in victimization. Implications of the findings and future directions for research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-011-9551-1

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have demonstrated favourable results for the KiVa programme in terms of reducing the psychological impact of traditional bullying experiences on students.

    “Several studies have demonstrated favourable results for the programme in terms of reducing the psychological impact of traditional bullying experiences on students (e.g., Williford et al., 2012).”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Williford et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williford, A., Boulton, A., Noland, B., Little, T. D., Kärnä, A., & Salmivalli, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Williford, Anne
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2011-08-06
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
289-300
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2165867703
Cited by
219
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
KiVa program, bullying prevention, peer victimization, depression, anxiety, internalizing problems, peer perception, adolescents, school-based intervention, primary and lower secondary school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Psychology, Child, Depressive Disorder, Female, Finland, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Social Perception, Program Evaluation, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review