Cited by 143Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The dynamics of death and meaning: The effects of death-relevant cognitions and personal need for structure on perceptions of meaning in life

Vess, Matthew, Routledge, Clay, Landau, Mark J., Arndt, Jamie·2009·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Do reminders of mortality increase or decrease perceptions of life's meaning? The authors propose that death-relevant thought has divergent effects on meaning perceptions depending on individuals' personal need for structure (PNS) or dispositional desire for structured knowledge. In prior research, high-PNS individuals primed with mortality-related stimuli were found to employ clearly structured conceptions of reality. Consequently, these individuals were expected to show stable or even bolstered perceptions of meaning when death thought was heightened. Low-PNS individuals did not show this tendency and were therefore expected to show decreased meaning under heightened death-thought activation. The results of Studies 1a-1d supported these hypotheses. Studies 2 and 3 sought to identify how low-PNS individuals might reaffirm meaning and found that death thought increased their willingness to explore novelty. Studies 4 and 5 directly tested the meaning-conferring function of novelty seeking among low-PNS individuals, showing that the consideration of novel interpretations of the world and their experiences affirmed a sense of meaning in life following reminders of death. Discussion focuses on the relationship between meaning and death and the unique ways low-PNS individuals respond to mortality concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016417

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After mortality salience, participants low in personal need for structure tended to be more open-minded regarding violations of the just-world assumption, preferred a more flexible self-concept, and became more interested in exploring novel social, intellectual, and environmental stimuli.

    “After MS, participants low in PNS tended to be more open-minded regarding violations of the just-world assumption ([111], Study 5), preferred a more flexible self-concept ([112], Study 1), and became more interested in exploring novel social, intellectual, and environmental stimuli [113].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vess, M., Routledge, C., Landau, M. J., & Arndt, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • North Dakota State University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2009
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
728-744
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2006676155
Cited by
143
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meaning in life, death thoughts, mortality salience, need for structure, fear of death, novelty seeking, structured knowledge
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Attitude to Death, Cognition, Cues, Exploratory Behavior, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Perception, Students, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review