The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859
Abstract
The 1–2 September 1859 magnetic storm was the most intense in recorded history on the basis of previously reported ground observations and on newly reduced ground‐based magnetic field data. Using empirical results on the interplanetary magnetic field strengths of magnetic clouds versus velocities, we show that the 1 September 1859 Carrington solar flare most likely had an associated intense magnetic cloud ejection which led to a storm on Earth of D ST ∼ −1760 nT. This is consistent with the Colaba, India local noon magnetic response of ΔH = 1600 ± 10 nT. It is found that both the 1–2 September 1859 solar flare energy and the associated coronal mass ejection speed were extremely high but not unique. Other events with more intense properties have been detected; thus a storm of this or even greater intensity may occur again. Because the data for the high‐energy tails of solar flares and magnetic storms are extremely sparse, the tail distributions and therefore the probabilities of occurrence cannot be assigned with any reasonable accuracy. A further complication is a lack of knowledge of the saturation mechanisms of flares and magnetic storms. These topics are discussed in some detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of the March 1989 solar activity
Allen, J., Sauer, H., Frank, L., & Reiff, P. (1989) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/89eo00409 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Superflares on solar-type stars
Maehara, H., Shibayama, T., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Kusaba, S., Honda, S., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11063 · Cited by 642
SUPERFLARES ON SOLAR-TYPE STARS OBSERVED WITH KEPLER . I. STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF SUPERFLARES
Shibayama, T., Maehara, H., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Honda, S., Ishii, T. T., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/5 · Cited by 500
Prebiotic chemistry and atmospheric warming of early Earth by an active young Sun
Airapetian, V. S., Glocer, A., Gronoff, G., Hébrard, E., & Danchi, W. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2719 · Cited by 320
The economic impact of space weather: where do we stand?
Eastwood, J. P., Biffis, E., Hapgood, M. A., Green, L., Bisi, M. M., Bentley, R. D., Wicks, R., McKinnell, L. ‐., Gibbs, M., & Burnett, C. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12765 · Cited by 310
The Origin, Early Evolution and Predictability of Solar Eruptions
Green, L. M., Török, T., Vršnak, B., Manchester, W., & Veronig, A. (2018) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0462-5 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsurutani, B. T., Gonzalez, W. D., Lakhina, G. S., & Alex, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- A7
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991191639
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.