Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychological assessment.

Open access
Cipolotti, L, Warrington, E K·1995·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

reasoning tasks.7 The most posterior parts of both hemispheres are involved in early visual processing. Subcortical, as well as cortical, brain regions, are involved in attention and alertness. Subcortical brain regions are also involved in episodic memory, in some aspects of long term memory, and in the motor control of language.12 A modularity approach to the analysis of cognitive skills implies that each complex cognitive process can be thought of as consisting of a series of functionally independent specialised subprocesses.72$29 The interaction of these subprocesses results in the complex cognitive skills. The way in which the cognitive processes are organised is often characterised, similarly to the "diagram maker" approach, in terms of flow diagrams that attempt to detail the way that the different subprocesses are brought together to perform a specific task. Empirical support for the modularity approach can be obtained at various levels including the neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and neuropsychological.'031 For example, numeracy has been fractionated into several independent components: cognitive mechanisms for number comprehension, number production, arithmetical fact retrieval, and arithmetical procedures.'2 The idea that complex cognitive skills are carried out by distinct subprocesses combined with the idea that there are highly specialised areas in the brain, has led many cognitive neuropsychologists to assume that a cerebral lesion can damage only some subprocesses within complex cognitive skills. Indeed, cognitive neuropsychologists have succeeded in showing many dissociations between the subcomponents of cognitive skills that allow valid conclusions about the nature and functions of the impaired processing components to be drawn. Methods ofassessment of cognitive

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.58.6.655

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 3,234

Metadata

Authors
Cipolotti, L., & Warrington, E. K.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-06-01
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
655-664
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211142904
Cited by
3,234
References
2
FWCI
141.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.58.6.655
The paper
Cipolotti, L., & Warrington, E. K. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.58.6.655

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.