Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI

Open access
HØST, ERIK, LINDENBERG, SVEND, SMIDT-JENSEN, STEEN·2000·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of spermatozoa with DNA strand breaks in four clinically different groups of infertile couples, and to correlate DNA damage with other semen analysis parameters, as well as fertilization rates and IVF outcome. METHODS: One group consisted of 75 men where the female partners had a tubal obstruction, Group A. Fifty sperm samples were collected from men in unexplained infertile couples, Group B. Fifty men with oligozoospermia and IVF made up Group C. Finally, 61 men with oligozoospermia and where ICSI was performed made up Group D. Sperm samples were assessed according to the WHO manual and for the presence of DNA strand breaks in spermatozoa. The study was blinded for the technician involved in the assessment of DNA strand breaks. IVF was carried out according to a long down regulation protocol using GnRH, FSH and hCG. Embryos were transferred on day 2 after fertilization with a maximum of three embryos. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a negative correlation between the proportion of spermatozoa having DNA strand breaks and the proportion of oocytes fertilized after IVF (p<0.01). Furthermore, the number of spermatozoa with DNA strand breaks was important for the pregnancy rate in the group of unexplained infertile couples. After ICSI no association was found between spermatozoa with DNA strand breaks and fertilization rates (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa impairs fertilization in both unexplained infertile couples and those with oligozoospermia and IVF. However, after ICSI, this impact of DNA strand breaks were not seen. This creates a specific indication and treatment for this new diagnosed group of otherwise unexplained infertile men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
HØST, E., LINDENBERG, S., & SMIDT-JENSEN, S.
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
79
Issue
7
Pages
559-563
ISSN
0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165371145
Cited by
192
References
1
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x
The paper
HØST, E., LINDENBERG, S., & SMIDT-JENSEN, S. (2000). The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.