Cited by 138Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

An evaluation of midwives' counseling of pregnant women in fear of childbirth

Open access
Ryding, Elsa Lena, Persson, Asa, Onell, Cecilia, Kvist, Linda·2003·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 10–17. © Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003 Background. The aim of this clinical evaluation was to study birth experience, post‐traumatic stress symptoms, and satisfaction with care in new mothers who had consulted specially trained midwives because of a fear of childbirth during pregnancy. Methods. Sixty‐two women were eligible for the study, of whom 53 (85%) participated at 1–14 months postpartum. For comparison, a group of 53 women were matched for parity and mode of delivery. All 106 women completed two self‐rating scales, the Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (W‐DEQ) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES), and answered several open questions about their opinion of the antenatal preparation given. Results. Those women who had been treated for fear of childbirth reported a rather more frightening experience of delivery, and more frequent symptoms of post‐traumatic stress related to delivery than did the women in the comparison group. Nevertheless, satisfaction with care was manifest in the study group. Conclusions. Women who seek help for fear of childbirth are a vulnerable group. Because the counseling received by the women in this study did not accord them the same positive experience of childbirth as the average parturient at the unit, more effective forms of treatment may be necessary. However, as most of the women were very satisfied with their care and with the outcome, one may assume that the care given had improved their situation to some degree.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.820102.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although guidelines exist, the content of standard care and the time set aside for it differ between hospitals.

    “Although guidelines exist [49], the content of SC and the time set aside for it differ between hospitals [28,50].”

    From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that this hospital’s fear-of-childbirth team spent more time with patients than its usual antenatal units. The fear-of-childbirth-team section describes care at Helsingborg Hospital, but neither passage addresses whether the content or time allotted to standard care differs between hospitals (searched: different hospitals, standard care, usual care, and time spent). The guidelines clause is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sjögren B. Fear of childbirth and psychosomatic support. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 819-25.
  2. Saisto T, Yliklorkala O, Halmesma ¨ki E. Analysis of factors associated with secondary fear of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 106: 679-82.
  3. NordstrOm-Erlandsson B. Risk and resilience during the neonatal period. Dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Goteborg, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryding, E. L., Persson, A., Onell, C., & Kvist, L.
Affiliations
Helsingborgs lasarett (SE)
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
10-17
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2144372147
Cited by
138
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of the Sunshine Coast
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
fear of childbirth, midwife counseling, antenatal preparation, childbirth experience, posttraumatic stress symptoms, satisfaction with care, postpartum women, Impact of Event Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Counseling, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review