Cited by 280Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain Management

Pre‐ and postpartum levels of childbirth fear and the relationship to birth outcomes in a cohort of Australian women

Open access
Fenwick, Jennifer, Gamble, Jenny, Nathan, Elizabeth, Bayes, Sara, Hauck, Yvonne·2009·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aim. To investigate pre‐ and postpartum levels of childbirth fear in a cohort of childbearing women and explore the relationship to birth outcomes. Background. While results are mixed, there is evidence that fear of childbirth is associated with mode of birth. Limited theoretical work around childbirth fear has been undertaken with Australian women. Design. A prospective correlation design. Method. Women ( n = 401) completed the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W‐DEQ) version A at 36 weeks gestation, with 243 (61%) women also completing version B at six weeks postpartum. Scores were summarised with means and standard deviations. Content analysis of the free statements identified nine issues of concern. Results. Twenty‐six per cent of pregnant women reported low levels of childbirth fear, 48% were moderately fearful and 26% were highly fearful. Fear decreased after birth for those women in the high antenatal fear group, however surgical intervention at birth ( n = 238, anova , F 1,230 = 12·39, p = 0·001) and suspected fetal compromise ( F 1,230 = 4·33, p = 0·039) increased levels of postpartum fear. Univariately, high antenatal fear was associated with emergency caesarean delivery ( n = 324, Wald 5·05, p = 0·025) however after adjustment for nulliparity and fetal compromise the association disappeared. Australian‐born women were more likely to report higher levels of fear and experience higher rates of caesarean section than participants of non‐Australian origin. Conclusions. Results support those from earlier studies in showing that nulliparous women experience more fear than parous women before birth and that there is no difference in levels of postpartum fear between these two groups. Fear levels were higher in Australian women when compared to a Swedish sample. Relevance to clinical practice. The results of this study add to our preliminary understanding of the phenomena of childbirth fear within an Australian context and are particularly useful in profiling women for whom secondary fear of childbirth is more likely to occur.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02568.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women fearing birth vary with regard to fear acquisition, fear objects, symptom severity, and comorbidity.

    “Many other variations exist among women fearing birth with regard to fear acquisition, fear objects, symptom severity, and comorbidity [20-23].”

    From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes different objects of childbirth fear, and the Results (page not provided) distinguish low, moderate and high fear levels. The paper also discusses how birth experiences can affect later fear, but our copy does not establish variation in psychiatric comorbidity among women fearing birth. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Postpartum levels of FOB have been associated with previous mode of delivery, intervention at birth, or emergency cesarean births, as with more negative birth experiences.

    “Furthermore, postpartum levels of FOB have been associated with previous mode of delivery, intervention at birth, or emergency cesarean births [4,13,20], as with more negative birth experiences [4,13].”

    From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report that intervention at birth—specifically caesarean or forceps/vacuum delivery—was associated with higher postpartum fear. They do not establish an association between postpartum fear and a previous mode of delivery or a more negative birth experience. Emergency caesarean is included within the intervention finding, but the paper’s separate emergency-caesarean analysis concerns antenatal fear, not postpartum fear. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fenwick J, Gamble J & Mawson J (2003) Women's experiences of caesarean section and VBAC: a 'Birthrites' initiative. Journal of International Nursing Practice 9, 10-17.
  2. Fenwick J, Gamble J & Hauck Y (2006) Reframing birth: a conse- quence of caesarean section for a self-selected group of Western Australian women. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56, 121-132.
  3. Menage J (1993) Post-traumatic stress disorder in women who have undergone obstetric and/or gynaecological procedures. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 11, 221-228.
  4. Miesnik SR & Reale BJ (2007) Review of issues surrounding medi- cally elective cesarean delivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologi- cal and Neonatal Nursing 36, 605-615.
  5. Willms JD (2002) Vulnerable Children: Findings from Canada's National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. The Uni- versity of Alberta Press, Edmonton.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Nathan, E., Bayes, S., & Hauck, Y.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Fenwick, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-12
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
667-677
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W1497579748
Cited by
280
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
fear of childbirth, birth outcomes, cesarean section, emergency caesarean delivery, fetal compromise, nulliparity, parity, Australian women, Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cesarean Section, Emergencies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Western Australia, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Neonatal Nursing, Qualitative Research, Parturition, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review