Cited by 162Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

Support for pregnant women identified with fear of childbirth (FOC)/tokophobia – A systematic review of approaches and interventions

Striebich, Sabine, Mattern, Elke, Ayerle, Gertrud M.·2018·Midwifery

Abstract

Background providing appropriate care for pregnant women with high or severe fear of childbirth (FOC) is a challenge in midwifery care today. FOC is associated with predisposing anamnestic factors, various sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, and may result in serious healthrelated consequences. It is therefore important to establish which interventions may increase a woman's faith in her own ability to cope with labour and birth. Aim to systematically identify and review studies examining interventions for relief of severe fear of childbirth in pregnancy and their underlying conceptual foundation. Methods a systematic literature search was performed following Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA Statement recommendations. Inclusion criteria were: studies including pregnant women diagnosed with high or severe FOC or who requested a caesarean section due to severe FOC, studies (regardless of design) observing the effect of an intervention addressing FOC, and studies published in English. Publications addressing anxiety or stress were excluded. 377 references were screened by title and abstract. The risk of bias was assessed. Findings 19 articles referring to 15 research projects were included in the analysis. The studies show heterogeneity regarding assessment methods, type, conceptualisation and application of interventions. There is evidence that both cognitive therapy sessions and a theory-based group psychoeducation with relaxation are effective interventions. K…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.013

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Striebich, S., Mattern, E., & Ayerle, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Hochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Striebich, Sabine
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
61
Pages
97-115
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788962344
Cited by
162
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
fear of childbirth, prenatal care, midwifery intervention, cognitive therapy, group psychoeducation, relaxation, cesarean section, self-efficacy, nulliparous women, prenatal anxiety
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Social Support, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review