An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research.

Cited by (22)

1. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
   Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Lee, Jeong-Yeon, Podsakoff, Nathan P. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
2. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
   Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Podsakoff, Nathan P. · 2012 · Annual Review of Psychology
3. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale
   Chen, Gilad, Gully, Stanley M., Eden, Dov · 2001 · Organizational Research Methods
4. Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
   Spector, Paul E. · 2006 · Organizational Research Methods
5. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects.
   Siemsen, Enno, Roth, Aleda, Oliveira, Pedro · 2010 · Organizational Research Methods
6. Common method bias: It’ s bad, it’ s complex, it’ s widespread, and it’ s not easy to fix
   Podsakoff, Philip M., Podsakoff, Nathan P., Williams, Larry J., Huang, Chengquan, Yang, Junhui · 2024 · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
7. A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance
   Richardson, Hettie A., Simmering, Marcia J., Sturman, Michael C. · 2009 · Organizational Research Methods
8. EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
   NISHII, LISA H., LEPAK, DAVID P., SCHNEIDER, BENJAMIN · 2008 · Personnel Psychology
9. Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
   Doty, D. Harold, Glick, William H. · 1998 · Organizational Research Methods
10. Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale
    Van den Broeck, Anja, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, De Witte, Hans, Soenens, Bart, Lens, Willy · 2010 · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
11. Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables
    Spector, Paul E., Brannick, Michael T. · 2011 · Organizational Research Methods
12. Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research
    Goodman, Jodi S., Blum, Terry C. · 1996 · Journal of Management
13. Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance: A Review and Demonstration
    Simmering, Marcia J., Fuller, Christie M., Richardson, Hettie A., Ocal, Yasemin, Atinc, Guclu M. · 2015 · Organizational Research Methods
14. Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory.
    Greguras, Gary J., Diefendorff, James M. · 2009 · Journal of Applied Psychology
15. The Affective Underpinnings of Job Perceptions and Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Integration.
    Thoresen, Carl J., Kaplan, Seth A., Barsky, Adam P., Warren, Christopher R., de Chermont, Kelly · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
16. Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance.
    Chen, Gilad, Gully, Stanley M., Whiteman, Jon-Andrew, Kilcullen, Robert N. · 2000 · Journal of Applied Psychology
17. Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change
    Bommer, William H., Rich, Gregory A., Rubin, Robert S. · 2005 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
18. Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement
    A. Agarwal, Upasna · 2014 · Personnel Review
19. Perceived victimization in the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics.
    Aquino, Karl, Bradfield, Murray · 2000 · Organization Science
20. Teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviour: considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader–member exchange.
    Runhaar, Piety, Konermann, Judith, Sanders, Karin · 2013 · Teaching and Teacher Education
21. Hardiness and Support at Work as Predictors of Work Stress and Job Satisfaction
    McCalister, Katherine T., Dolbier, Christyn L., Webster, Judith A., Mallon, Mark W., Steinhardt, Mary A. · 2006 · American Journal of Health Promotion
22. When ownership of the venture triggers cofounders’ unethical pro-venture behavior
    Hong, Michelle C., Lin, Hsing-Er, Hsu, Dan K., Shi, Yongchuan · 2021 · Journal of Business Venturing Insights