Cited by 240Personality Traits and PsychologyEthics in Business and EducationPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes

Open access
Egan, Vincent, Hughes, Natalie, Palmer, Emma J.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.054

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissists more lightheartedly excuse their immoral acts and ignore conventional behavioral rules such as following a boss's instructions.

    “Furthermore, narcissists have been found to more lightheartedly excuse their immoral acts (Egan, Hughes, & Palmer, 2015) and to ignore conventional behavioral rules such as following their boss’s instructions in the workplace (Judge et al., 2006).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Egan, Hughes, & Palmer, 2015

    Only the claim about excusing immoral acts is attributed to this paper; the workplace claim cites Judge et al. The Discussion (page unavailable) says narcissism did not predict moral disengagement or unethical consumer attitudes, contrary to the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A factor analytic study showed a stronger clustering of psychopathy and Machiavellianism with other variables capturing antisocial variance, whereas narcissism was much stronger associated with a non-antisocial factor alongside traits such as extraversion and intellect.

    “Indeed, a factor analytic study showed a stronger clustering of psychopathy and Machiavellianism with other variables (e.g., moral disengagement, unethical attitudes, and disagreeableness) capturing antisocial variance, whereas narcissism was much stronger associated with a non-antisocial factor alongside traits such as extraversion and intellect (11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ritter, N. (2012). A comparison of distribution-free and non-distribution free methods in factor analysis. Paper presented at Southwestern Educational Research Association (SERA) Conference 2012, New Orleans, LA (ED529153). Downloaded from: http://www.academia.edu/1713092/A_Comparison_of_Distribution_Free_and_Non- distribution_Free_Factor_Analysis_Methods, June 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egan, V., Hughes, N., & Palmer, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Egan, Vincent
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
76
Pages
123-128
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052021119
Cited by
239
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
moral disengagement, Dark Triad, antisocial behavior, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, personality traits, incremental validity, consumer ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review