The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance.

L. A. Witt, Lisa A. Burke, Murray R. Barrick, Michael Kelly Mount·2002·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance would be stronger for persons high in agreeableness than for those low in agreeableness. Results of hierarchical moderated regression analyses for 7 independent samples of employees across diverse occupations provided support for the hypothesis in 5 of the samples. In samples supporting the hypothesis, among the highly conscientious workers, those low in agreeableness were found to receive lower ratings of job performance than workers high in agreeableness. One explanation for lack of an interaction between conscientiousness and agreeableness in the other 2 samples is that those jobs were not characterized by frequent, cooperative interactions with others. Overall, the results show that highly conscientious workers who lack interpersonal sensitivity may be ineffective, particularly in jobs requiring cooperative interchange with others.

Cites (4)

  1. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
    BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
  2. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
    Goldberg, Lewis R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment
  3. Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers.
    Hogan, Robert, Hogan, Joyce, Roberts, Brent W. · 1996 · American Psychologist
  4. Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between consciousness and job performance.
    Hochwarter, Wayne A., Witt, L. A., Kacmar, K. Michele · 2000 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (12)

  1. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening
    Davis, Richard A., Flett, Gordon L., Besser, Avi · 2002 · CyberPsychology & Behavior
  2. The Person–Situation Debate Revisited: Effect of Situation Strength and Trait Activation on the Validity of the Big Five Personality Traits in Predicting Job Performance
    Judge, Timothy A., Zapata, Cindy P. · 2015 · Academy of Management Journal
  3. Too engaged? a conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family
    Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B., Harvey, Jaron, Bolino, Mark C. · 2009 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance
    Peterson, Randall S., Smith, D. Brent, Martorana, Paul V., Owens, Pamela D. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES
    MOUNT, MICHAEL K., BARRICK, MURRAY R., SCULLEN, STEVE M., ROUNDS, JAMES · 2005 · Personnel Psychology

See all 488

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.164
The paper
Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.164

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.