Cited by 4,623Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementHuman Resource and Talent Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis.

Harter, James K., Schmidt, Frank L., Hayes, Theodore L.·2002·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Based on 7,939 business units in 36 companies, this study used meta-analysis to examine the relationship at the business-unit level between employee satisfaction-engagement and the business-unit outcomes of customer satisfaction, productivity, profit, employee turnover, and accidents. Generalizable relationships large enough to have substantial practical value were found between unit-level employee satisfaction-engagement and these business-unit outcomes. One implication is that changes in management practices that increase employee satisfaction may increase business-unit outcomes, including profit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bouchard, 1997, Genetic influence on mental abilities, personality, vocational interests, and work attitudes., Vol. 12, 373
  2. Harter, 2000, Validation of a performance-related and actionable management tool: A meta-analysis and utility analysis (Gallup Technical Report).
  3. 1987, Standard Industrial Classification manual.
  4. 10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.963 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166 · DOI
  6. Seligman, 2000, Special issue on happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning., The American Psychologist, 55
  7. Wiley. Customer satisfaction: A supportive work environment and its financial cost. 14 117 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,623

Metadata

Authors
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
268-279
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2005673510
Cited by
4,623
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 213 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 293 · 2022: 268 · 2021: 275 · 2020: 307 · 2019: 292 · 2018: 262 · 2017: 282 · 2016: 257 · 2015: 268 · 2014: 268 · 2013: 255 · 2012: 239
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
job satisfaction, employee engagement, customer satisfaction, productivity, profitability, employee turnover, occupational accidents, management practices, organizational performance
MeSH terms
Consumer Behavior, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Culture, Efficiency, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review