Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning.

King, Alison, Staffieri, Anne, Adelgais, Anne·1998·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study demonstrates that tutorial interaction can be structured so that same-ability age mates can scaffold each other's higher order thinking and learning. Seventh graders were assigned in pairs to 3 mutual peer-tutoring conditions: explanation only (E), inquiry plus explanation (IE), and sequenced inquiry plus explanation (SIE). Tutorial sessions followed teacher-led science lessons over a 5-week treatment. IE and SIE students were trained to ask comprehension and thought-provoking questions on the material when in the tutoirole and to explain material to partners when acting as tutee. SIE students received additional training in asking their questions in a particular sequence. E students explained material to each other. SIE students outperformed IE and E students on ability to construct knowledge both during their tutorial interaction and on written measures.

Cites (32)

  1. Untitled work
    1978 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  2. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes
    1991 · Elsevier eBooks
  3. Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
    Cohen, Elizabeth G. · 1994 · Review of Educational Research
  4. Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings
    Cohen, Peter A, Kulik, James A., Kulik, Chen-Lin C. · 1982 · American Educational Research Journal
  5. Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology
    Mathews, Peter V., Moll, L. C. · 1991 · British Journal of Educational Studies
  6. Peer interaction and learning in small groups
    Webb, Noreen M. · 1989 · International Journal of Educational Research
  7. Generative Processes of Comprehension
    Wittrock, Merlin C. · 1989 · Educational Psychologist
  8. CHILDREN'S BELIEFS IN THEIR OWN CONTROL OF REINFORCEMENTS IN INTEUECTUAL-ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT SITUATIONS
    CRANDALL, VIRGINIA C, KATKOVSKY, WALTER, CRANDALL, VAUGHN J. · 1965 · Child Development
  9. Question Asking During Tutoring
    Graesser, Arthur C., Person, Natalie K. · 1994 · American Educational Research Journal
  10. Learning as a generative process 1
    Wittrock, M. C. · 1974 · Educational Psychologist

Show all 32 references

Cited by (8)

  1. Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions
    Roscoe, Rod D., Chi, Michelene T. H. · 2007 · Review of Educational Research
  2. Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion
    Chinn, Clark A., Anderson, Richard C., Waggoner, Martha A. · 2001 · Reading Research Quarterly
  3. Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing
    King, Alison · 2002 · Theory Into Practice
  4. The Psychology of Academic Achievement
    Winne, Philip H., Nesbit, John C. · 2010 · Annual Review of Psychology
  5. Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument
    Reznitskaya, Alina, Anderson, Richard C., McNurlen, Brian, Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim, Archodidou, Anthi, Kim, So-young · 2001 · Discourse Processes

See all 310

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.90.1.134
The paper
King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.90.1.134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.