The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill.

Sá, Walter C., West, Richard F., Stanovich, Keith E.·1999·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The domain specificity and generality of belief-biased reasoning was examined across a height judgment task and a syllogistic reasoning task that differed greatly in cognitive requirements. Moderate correlations between belief-bias indices on these 2 tasks falsified an extreme form of the domain specificity view of critical thinking skills. Two measures of cognitive ability and 2 measures of cognitive decontextualization skill were positively correlated with belief bias in a height judgment task where prior knowledge accurately reflected an aspect of the environment and negatively correlated with belief bias in a height judgment task where prior knowledge was incongruent with the environment. Likewise, cognitive ability was associated with skill at resisting the influence of prior knowledge in the syllogistic reasoning task. Participants high in cognitive ability were able to flexibly use prior knowledge, depending upon its efficacy in a particular environment. They were more likely to project a relationship when it reflected a useful cue, but they were also less likely to project a prior belief when the belief was inefficacious.

Cites (97)

  1. Using multivariate statistics
    Barbara Gerson Tabachnick, Linda S. Fidell · 1983
  2. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
    Bloch, Maurice, Lave, Jean, Wenger, Etienne · 1994 · Man
  3. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
    Cohen, Patricia, Cohen, Patricia, West, Stephen G., Aiken, Leona S. · 2014 · Psychology Press eBooks
  4. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
    Brown, John Seely, Collins, Allan, Duguid, Paul · 1989 · Educational Researcher
  5. The case for motivated reasoning.
    Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
    Nickerson, Raymond S. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
  7. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years; A Scheme
    William G. Perry · 1970
  8. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
    Steven A. Sloman · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
  9. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes
    1991 · Elsevier eBooks
  10. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
    Epstein, Seymour · 1994 · American Psychologist

Show all 97 references

Cited by (26)

  1. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  2. The Affect Heuristic
    Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  3. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
    Toplak, Maggie E., West, Richard F., Stanovich, Keith E. · 2011 · Memory & Cognition
  4. Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis
    Abrami, Philip C., Bernard, Robert M., Borokhovski, Evgueni, Wade, Anne, Surkes, Michael A., Tamim, Rana, Zhang, Dai · 2008 · Review of Educational Research
  5. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis
    Abrami, Philip C., Bernard, Robert M., Borokhovski, Eugene, Waddington, David I., Wade, C. Anne, Persson, Tonje · 2015 · Review of Educational Research

See all 311

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.497
The paper
Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.497

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.