Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.

Lord, Charles G., Lepper, Mark R., Preston, Elizabeth·1984·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

It is proposed that several biases in social judgment result from a failure--first noted by Francis Bacon--to consider possibilities at odds with beliefs and perceptions of the moment. Individuals who are induced to consider the opposite, therefore, should display less bias in social judgment. In two separate but conceptually parallel experiments, this reasoning was applied to two domains--biased assimilation of new evidence on social issues and biased hypothesis testing of personality impressions. Subjects were induced to consider the opposite in two ways: through explicit instructions to do so and through stimulus materials that made opposite possibilities more salient. In both experiments the induction of a consider-the-opposite strategy had greater corrective effect than more demand-laden alternative instructions to be as fair and unbiased as possible. The results are viewed as consistent with previous research on perseverance, hindsight, and logical problem solving, and are thought to suggest an effective method of retraining social judgment.

Cites (2)

  1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
  2. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence
    Lord, Charles G., Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (29)

  1. The case for motivated reasoning.
    Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
    Nickerson, Raymond S. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
  3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  4. The Affect Heuristic
    Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  5. Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
    Babcock, Linda, Loewenstein, George · 1997 · Journal of Economic Perspectives

See all 740

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1231
The paper
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.