The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement.
Abstract
Self-consistency theory assumes that people want others to treat them in a predictable manner. Self-enhancement theory contends that people want others to treat them in a positive manner. We attempted to help reconcile the two theories by testing the hypothesis that people's cognitive responses conform to self-consistency theory and their affective responses conform to self-enhancement theory. We presented individuals who possessed either positive or negative self-concepts with either favorable or unfavorable social feedback. We then measured cognitive reactions to the feedback (e.g., perceived self-descriptiveness) and affective reactions to the feedback (e.g., mood states). Cognitive responses were primarily driven by the consistency of the feedback and affective responses were controlled by how enhancing it was. We propose that conceptualizing cognition an affect as partially independent mental systems helps resolve some long-standing paradoxes regarding people's responses to self-relevant social feedback.
Cites (36)
- - STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES2014 · Statistical Methods in Psychiatry Research and SPSS
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Mind, Self, and Society: The Definitive EditionMead, George Herbert, Joas, Hans, Huebner, Daniel R., Morris, Charles W. · 2015 · University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
- Untitled work1962 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
- On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of PsychotherapyCarl Ransom Rogers · 1961 · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
- Depression: Causes and treatment1973 · Behavior Therapy
- Progress in experimental personality researchWinifred B. Maher, Brendan A. Maher · 1964 · Academic Press eBooks
- Psychological perspectives on the selfJerry M. Suls, Anthony G. Greenwald · 1982 · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks
- Untitled work1983
Cited by (43)
- Rethinking ruminationNolen-Hoeksema, Susan, Wisco, Blair E., Lyubomirsky, Sonja · 2008 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
- The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theoryLeary, Mark R., Baumeister, Roy F. · 2000 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.Baumeister, Roy F., Smart, Laura, Boden, Joseph M. · 1996 · Psychological Review
- Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.Bornstein, Robert F. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
- You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to BrandsEscalas, Jennifer Edson, Bettman, James R. · 2003 · Journal of Consumer Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.52.5.881
- The paper
- Swann, W. B., Griffin, J. J., Predmore, S. C., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.5.881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.