Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation.

Linville, Patricia W., Fischer, Gregory W., Salovey, Peter·1989·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This research studied 2 properties of perceived distributions of the characteristics of social category members: the probability of differentiating (making distinctions) among category members and the perceived variability (variance) of category members. The results of 4 experiments supported the hypothesis that greater familiarity with a social group leads to greater perceived differentiation and variability regarding that group. In-group members formed more differentiated and variable distributions for groups defined by age and more differentiated distributions for groups defined by nationality. For gender (where students were roughly equally familiar with people of both genders), no in-group--out-group differences occurred. Also, students perceived greater differentiation and variability among classmates over the course of a semester. To explain these results, we developed PDIST, a multiple exemplar model that assumes that people form perceived distributions by activating a set of category exemplars and then judging the relative likelihoods of different feature values on the basis of the relative activation strengths of these feature values. The results of a computer simulation experiment indicated that PDIST is sufficient to explain the results of our 4 experiments. According to the perceived distributions formed by PDIST, increasing familiarity leads to greater differentiation and variability, has a concave impact, and has greater impact on differentiation than on variability.

Cites (4)

  1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
  2. Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
    Zajonc, Robert B. · 1968 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Context theory of classification learning
    Medin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
  4. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping.
    Taylor, Shelley E., Fiske, Susan T., Etcoff, Nancy L., Ruderman, Audrey J. · 1978 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (18)

  1. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  2. The Affect Heuristic
    Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  3. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
    Simons, Daniel J., Levin, Daniel T. · 1998 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  4. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories.
    Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig · 2001 · Psychology Public Policy and Law
  5. Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context
    Smith, Eliot R., Semin, Gün R. · 2004 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

See all 579

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.57.2.165
The paper
Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.2.165

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.