Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance.

Abstract

The present authors hypothesized, in contrast to I influential revision ofcognitive dissonance theory, that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance and that cognitive dissonance will occur even when aversive consequences are not produced. In Experiment l, participants drank a pleasant- or unpleasant-tasting beverage and were given high or low choice to write a sentence that said they liked the beverage. Participants threw the paper away once they had written the sentence and then rated how much they liked the beverage. In support of the hypothesis, unpleasant-tasting beverage/high-choice participants liked the beverage more than unpleasant-tasting beverage/low-choice participants. A 2nd experiment replicated this effect, using a different counterattitudinal action and different choice manipulation. By demonstrating that the manipulation of dissonance produced increased physiological arousal, a 3rd experiment suggested that selfperception theory could not alternatively explain the results of Experiments 1 and 2.

Cites (8)

1. Self-Perception Theory
   Bem, Daryl J. · 1972 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
2. The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
   Steele, Claude M. · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
   Bem, Daryl J. · 1967 · Psychological Review
4. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
   Festinger, Leon, Carlsmith, James M. · 1959 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
5. "Unconscious anxiety": Phobic responses to masked stimuli.
   Öhman, Arne, Soares, Joaquim J. F. · 1994 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
6. Inducing Hypocrisy as a Means of Encouraging Young Adults to Use Condoms
   Stone, Jeff, Aronson, Elliot, Crain, A. Lauren, Winslow, Matthew P., Fried, Carrie B. · 1994 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
7. Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy.
   Aronson, E, Fried, C, Stone, J · 1991 · American Journal of Public Health
8. Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a "Don't remind me" effect.
   Elkin, Roger A., Leippe, Michael R. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (16)

1. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
   Gawronski, Bertram, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
2. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance
   Schmader, Toni, Johns, Michael, Forbes, Chad · 2008 · Psychological Review
3. Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
   Hart, William, Albarracín, Dolores, Eagly, Alice H., Brechan, Inge, Lindberg, Matthew J., Merrill, Lisa · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space
   Cacioppo, John T., Gardner, Wendi L., Berntson, Gary G. · 1997 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
5. An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.
   Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Mills, Judson · 2019 · Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.).

See all 217