An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.
Open accessAbstract
This volume describes advances in the theory of cognitive dissonance, from its origination in 1954 to the present day.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional cognitive-motivational mechanisms that may exacerbate issue polarization include selective avoidance of counter-attitudinal information and motivated resistance to attitude change.
“Additional cognitive–motivational mechanisms that may exacerbate issue polarization include other forms of reduction in cognitive dissonance, such as selective avoidance of counter-attitudinal information and motivated resistance to attitude change (see Table 1), both of which reflect ego-defensive motives to avoid inconsistency and maintain the individual’s pre-existing beliefs, opinions and”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [125]
Cites
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · see citing works
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697 · see citing works
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
Bem, D. J. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024835 · Cited by 2,959 · see citing works
Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.
Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036651 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Social perception of systemic risks
Schweizer, P., Goble, R., & Renn, O. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13831 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Sutfin, E. L., Szykman, L. R., & Moore, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730802198961 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Zhao, X., Ma, Z., Xu, S., & Austin, L. L. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2154017 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
AI apology: a critical review of apology in AI systems
Harland, H., Dazeley, R., Senaratne, H., Vamplew, P., Cruz, F., & Nakisa, B. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11305-8 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Impact of Voice Fidelity on Decision Making: A Potential Dark Pattern?
Dubiel, M., Sergeeva, A., & Leiva, L. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645202 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zheng, C., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106531 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- ORCID
- Harmon-Jones, Eddie
- Venue
- Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.).
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 3-24
- OpenAlex
- W2499437758
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 129 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 335.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- cognitive dissonance theory, dissonance reduction, attitude change, psychological discomfort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review