Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility.

Abstract

Results of 3 studies support the notion that anchoring is a special case of semantic priming; specifically, information that is activated to solve a comparative anchoring task will subsequently be more accessible when participants make absolute judgments. By using the logic of priming research, in Study 1 the authors showed that the strength of the anchor effect depends on the applicability of activated information. Study 2 revealed a contrast effect when the activated information was not representative for the absolute judgment and the targets of the 2 judgment tasks were sufficiently different. Study 3 demonstrated that generating absolute judgments requires more time when comparative judgments include an implausible anchor and can therefore be made without relevant target information that would otherwise be accessible.

Cites (2)

1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
2. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
   Klayman, Joshua, Ha, Young-won · 1987 · Psychological Review

Show all 2 references

Cited by (25)

1. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
   Kahneman, Daniel · 2003 · American Psychologist
2. Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
   Strack, Fritz, Deutsch, Roland · 2004 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
4. The trouble with overconfidence.
   Moore, Don A., Healy, Paul J. · 2008 · Psychological Review
5. The Affect Heuristic
   Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases

See all 979