Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness.

Abstract

This article focuses on the question of why fairness matters to people. On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, the authors argue that people especially need fairness when they are uncertain about things that are important to them. Following terror management theory, the authors focus on a basic kind of human uncertainty: fear of death. Integrating these two theoretical frameworks, it is proposed that thinking about their mortality should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of three experiments support the authors' line of reasoning: Asking participants to think about their mortality led to stronger fair process effects (positive effects of perceived procedural fairness on subsequent reactions) than not asking them to think about mortality. It is argued that these findings suggest that fairness especially matters to people when they are uncertain about fundamental aspects of human life such as human mortality.

Cites (8)

1. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
   Lind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom R. · 1988 · Critical Issues in Social Justice
2. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
   Tyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: empirical assessments and conceptual refinements
   Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Pyszczynski, Tom · 1997 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
4. Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview
   Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon, Rosenblatt, Abram, Veeder, Mitchell, Kirkland, Shari, Lyon, Deborah · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews
   Solomon, Sheldon, Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom · 1991 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
6. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
   van den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan, Vermunt, Riël, Wilke, Henk A. M. · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. Death anxiety in older adults: A quantitative review
   V. Fortner, Robert A. Neimeyer, Barry · 1999 · Death Studies
8. Creativity and terror management: Evidence that creative activity increases guilt and social projection following mortality salience
   Arndt, Jamie, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon, Pyszczynski, Tom, Schimel, Jeff · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (32)

1. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
   Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., Sulloway, Frank J. · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.
   Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A., Rodell, Jessica B., Long, David M., Zapata, Cindy P., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J. · 2013 · Journal of Applied Psychology
3. Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice
   Cropanzano, Russell, Byrne, Zinta S., Bobocel, D.Ramona, Rupp, Deborah E. · 2001 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
4. The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
   Heine, Steven J., Proulx, Travis, Vohs, Kathleen D. · 2006 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
5. Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
   Burke, Brian L., Martens, Andy, Faucher, Erik H. · 2010 · Personality and Social Psychology Review

See all 250