Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction?: Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems.

Abstract

Research has consistently found that liberals and conservatives generate different attributions for the causes of social problems and respond differently to people who have internal-controllable causes for needing help. Five studies using a variety of methods (the "college bowl" paradigm, the attitude-attribution paradigm, 2 surveys with nationally representative samples, and an experiment that assessed attributional judgments under varying levels of cognitive load) explored whether these differences could be explained by (a) underlying dispositional differences in the tendency to see the causes of behavior as personally or situationally located, (b) ideological scripts, or (c) differences in the motivation to correct personal attributions. Results were most consistent with the motivated correction explanation. The findings shed further light on the cognitive strategies and motivational priorities of liberals and conservatives.

Cites (14)

1. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
   Festinger, Leon · 1957
2. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
   Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
3. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
   Zaller, John R. · 1992
4. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
   Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.
   Sears, David O. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
6. The attribution of attitudes
   Jones, Edward E, Harris, Victor A · 1967 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
7. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.
   Galinsky, Adam D., Moskowitz, Gordon B. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.
   Morris, Michael W., Peng, Kaiping · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography
   Gottfredson, Linda S. · 1997 · Intelligence
10. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 14 references

Cited by (18)

1. Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
   Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., Napier, Jaime L. · 2009 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. The end of the end of ideology.
   Jost, John T. · 2006 · American Psychologist
3. A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving
   Bekkers, René, Wiepking, Pamala · 2011 · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
4. Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
   Cohen, Geoffrey L. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims
   Small, Deborah A., Loewenstein, George, Slovic, Paul · 2007 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

See all 362