A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement.

Steven P. Brown·1996·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The author develops a theoretical framework relating job involvement to its antecedents, correlates, and consequences and reports meta-analyses of 51 pairwise relationships involving job involvement. Results of the meta-analyses support research suggesting that job involvement is influenced by personality and situational variables. Job involvement was strongly related to job and work attitudes but not to role perceptions, behavioral work outcomes, negative side effects, or demographic variables. Moderator analyses indicated little difference in the strength of relationships based on involvement measure. The author found modest but systematic differences in the strength of relationships between studies of employees of public versus private organizations. He compares and contrasts the results of this study with meta-analytic findings regarding organizational commitment, discusses important theoretical considerations in the research stream, and offers suggestions for future research.

Cites (7)

  1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
    Baron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Emotion And Adaptation
    Lazarus, Richard S · 1991
  3. PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.
    Kahn, W. A. · 1990 · Academy of Management Journal
  4. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
    Hackman, J. Richard, Oldham, Greg R. · 1975 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 2015
  6. Employee reactions to job characteristics.
    Hackman, J. Richard, Lawler, Edward E. · 1971 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  7. Measurement of job and work involvement
    Kanungo, Rabindra N. · 1982 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Show all 7 references

Cited by (21)

  1. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.
    Dirks, Kurt T., Ferrin, Donald L. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work
    May, Douglas R., Gilson, Richard L., Harter, Lynn M. · 2004 · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  3. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers
    Gignac, Gilles E., Szodorai, Eva T. · 2016 · Personality and Individual Differences
  4. WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
    CHRISTIAN, MICHAEL S., GARZA, ADELA S., SLAUGHTER, JEREL E. · 2011 · Personnel Psychology
  5. Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis
    Palmatier, Robert W., Dant, Rajiv P., Grewal, Dhruv, Evans, Kenneth R. · 2006 · Journal of Marketing

See all 855

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.120.2.235
The paper
Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.120.2.235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.