Social consequences of experiential openness.

Robert R. McCrae·1996·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Openness to Experience is one of the 5 broad factors that subsume most personality traits. Openness is usually considered an intrapsychic dimension, defined in terms of characteristics of consciousness. However, different ways of approaching and processing experience lead to different value systems that exercise a profound effect on social interactions. In this article, the author reviews the effects of Openness versus Closedness in cultural innovation, political ideology, social attitudes, marital choice, and interpersonal relations. The construct of Openness and its measures could profitably be incorporated into research conducted by social psychologists, sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and historians.

Cites (8)

  1. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
    BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
  2. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
    Goldberg, Lewis R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment
  3. “The Need for Cognition.”
    Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.
    Webster, Donna M., Kruglanski, Arie W. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”
    Kruglanski, Arie W., Webster, Donna M. · 1996 · Psychological Review
  6. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
    Block, Jack · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
  7. Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience
    McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1997 · Handbook of Personality Psychology
  8. Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality.
    Trapnell, Paul D., Wiggins, Jerry S. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (46)

  1. Untitled work
    1999
  2. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
    Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, Nosek, Brian A. · 2009 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.
    Steel, Piers · 2007 · Psychological bulletin
  4. Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.
    Keyes, Corey L. M., Shmotkin, Dov, Ryff, Carol D. · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health
    Kashdan, Todd B., Rottenberg, Jonathan · 2010 · Clinical Psychology Review

See all 1,138

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social consequences of experiential openness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.120.3.323
The paper
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.120.3.323

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.