Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21,995Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Representations and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 190 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu·1991·Psychological Review

Abstract

People in different cultures have strikingly different construals of the self, of others, and of the interdependence of the 2. These construals can influence, and in many cases determine, the very nature of individual experience, including cognition, emotion, and motivation. Many Asian cultures have distinct conceptions of individuality that insist on the fundamental relatedness of individuals to each other. The emphasis is on attending to others, fitting in, and harmonious interdependence with them. American culture neither assumes nor values such an overt connectedness among individuals. In contrast, individuals seek to maintain their independence from others by attending to the self and by discovering and expressing their unique inner attributes. As proposed herein, these construals are even more powerful than previously imagined. Theories of the self from both psychology and anthropology arc integrated to define in detail the difference between a construal of the self as independent and a construal of the self as interdependent. Each of these divergent construals should have a set of specific consequences for cognition, emotion, and motivation; these consequences are proposed and relevant empirical literature is reviewed. Focusing on differences in self-construals enables apparently inconsistent empirical findings to be reconciled, and raises questions about what have been thought to be culture-free aspects of cognition, emotion, and motivation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224

Cites

190 of 190 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

26 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 195 references

Cited by

See all 21,995

Metadata

Authors
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1991-04
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
224-253
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2097780989
Cited by
21,995
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 974 · 2025: 1019 · 2024: 922 · 2023: 1050 · 2022: 1017 · 2021: 1023 · 2020: 1268 · 2019: 1063 · 2018: 998 · 2017: 1011 · 2016: 905 · 2015: 1020 · 2014: 1048 · 2013: 975 · 2012: 906
FWCI
108.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
Keywords
self-construal, independent self, interdependent self-construal, culture and cognition, culture and emotion, Asian culture, American culture, individuality, interdependence, cross-cultural comparison, self-construal theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224
The paper
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.