Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?

Jared, Debra, Seidenberg, Mark S.·1991·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Six experiments addressed the role of phonological information in visual word recognition using a semantic-decision task. Experiment 1 replicated Van Orden's (1987) finding that Ss make more false-positive errors on homophone foils than on spelling controls, indicating phonological activation of meaning. Experiment 2 showed that only lower frequency words yield this effect when broader categories are used. In Experiments 3 and 4, the homophony effect for lower frequency words remained, even though the stimuli included a large proportion of homophones, suggesting that activation of phonological information cannot be strategically inhibited. Experi-ments 5 and 6 examined effects of homophony on targets that were correct category exemplars and yielded similar results. These studies indicate that in skilled readers, phonological information contributes to the activation of word meaning only for low-frequency words. The word's orthographies represent different solutions to the problem of representing spoken language in written form. Orthographies differ in the extent to which the written sym-bols encode phonological information. Historically, orthogra-phies have evolved toward more direct representations of

Cites (4)

  1. Lexical access and naming time
    Forster, Kenneth I., Chambers, Susan M. · 1973 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
  2. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
    van Orden, Guy C. · 1987 · Memory & Cognition
  3. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?
    Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., Haggard, P. N. · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  4. The role of syllables in perceptual processing
    Spoehr, Kathryn Troyer, Smith, Edward E · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (8)

  1. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.
    Harm, Michael W., Seidenberg, Mark S. · 1999 · Psychological Review
  2. ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution
    Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., Pernier, J. · 1999 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  3. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.
    McRae, Ken, de Sa, Virginia R., Seidenberg, Mark S. · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  4. The Lexical Constituency Model: Some Implications of Research on Chinese for General Theories of Reading.
    Perfetti, Charles A., Liu, Ying, Tan, Li Hai · 2005 · Psychological Review
  5. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.
    Lukatela, Georgije, Turvey, M. T. · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

See all 204

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.120.4.358
The paper
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.120.4.358

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.