Cited by 559Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When two sensory modes are better than one.

Tindall-Ford, Sharon, Chandler, Paul, Sweller, John·1997·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-898x.3.4.257

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Published
1997-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
257-287
ISSN
  • 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2192
OpenAlex
W2090580324
Cited by
559
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
multisensory integration, cross-modal perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When two sensory modes are better than one. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/1076-898x.3.4.257
The paper
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.3.4.257