Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry.
Abstract
Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance.
Cites (9)
- “Stress: appraisal and coping,”Folkman, Susan · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
- Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research1988 · Advances in Psychology
- Emotion And AdaptationLazarus, Richard S · 1991
- The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.Kluger, Avraham N., DeNisi, Angelo · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
- Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional statesWatson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
- Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluationEndler, Norman S., Parker, James D. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.Heatherton, Todd F., Polivy, Janet · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical frameworkRobert J. Hockey, G. · 1997 · Biological Psychology
- Test Anxiety1998 · Perspectives on Individual Differences
Cited by (10)
- Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention.Langner, Robert, Eickhoff, Simon B. · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin
- Fundamentals of physiological computingFairclough, Stephen H. · 2009 · Interacting with Computers
- EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysisChikhi, Samy, Matton, Nadine, Blanchet, Sophie · 2022 · Psychophysiology
- Rumination, Depression, and Metacognition: the S‐REF ModelMatthews, Gerald, Wells, Adrian · 2003 · Depressive Rumination
- Neuroticism from the Top Down: Psychophysiology and Negative EmotionalityMatthews, G. · 2004 · On the Psychobiology of Personality
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315
- The paper
- Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R. A., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.