Cited by 18,187Stress and Burnout ResearchHealth, psychology, and well-beingResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress

Hobfoll, Stevan E.·1989·American Psychologist

Abstract

Major perspectives concerning stress are presented with the goal of clarifying the nature of what has proved to be a heuristic but vague construct. Current conceptualizations of stress are challenged as being too phenomenological and ambiguous, and consequently, not given to direct empirical testing. Indeed, it is argued that researchers have tended to avoid the problem of defining stress, choosing to study stress without reference to a clear framework. A new stress model called the model of conservation of resources is presented as an alternative. This resource-oriented model is based on the supposition that people strive to retain, project, and build resources and that what is threatening to them is the potential or actual loss of these valued resources. Implications of the model of conservation of resources for new research directions are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18,187

Metadata

Authors
Hobfoll, S. E.
Corresponding author
Hobfoll, Stevan E.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1989
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
513-524
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4248161867
Cited by
18,187
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2934 · 2025: 2154 · 2024: 1582 · 2023: 1470 · 2022: 1549 · 2021: 1294 · 2020: 1015 · 2019: 842 · 2018: 722 · 2017: 673 · 2016: 523 · 2015: 488 · 2014: 473 · 2013: 375 · 2012: 371
FWCI
38.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
conservation of resources theory, stress, coping
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review