The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Broader View of Social Stereotyping.
Abstract
Stereotyping effects are typically considered to be assimilative in nature: A member of a group stereotyped as having some attribute is judged to have more of that attribute than a member of some comparison group. This article highlights the fact that stereotyping effects can also occur in the direction of contrast--or even null effects-- depending on the nature and form of the outcome being assessed (from the researcher's perspective, the dependent variable of interest). Relying on theory and research from the shifting standards model (M. Biernat, M. Manis, & T. F. Nelson, 1991), this review highlights the different ways in which and the factors that determine how stereotypes influence judgment and behavior toward individual group members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Cohen, D. (1998) · The Women's Review of Books · doi:10.2307/4022859 · Cited by 4,261
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,773
The Black-White Test Score Gap
(2011) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5771/9780815746119 · Cited by 1,715
On the Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled Processes
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · Cited by 1,278
Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117 · Cited by 1,157
Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5748 · Cited by 1,088
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33 · Cited by 1,086
Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.11.1202 · Cited by 936
Macrae, C. N., Hewstone, M., & Stangor, C. (1996) · Cited by 918
Cited by
A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82 · Cited by 2,163
Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33 · Cited by 1,169
Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience.
Sue, D. W., Bucceri, J., Lin, A. I., Nadal, K. L., & Torino, G. C. (2007) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.72 · Cited by 812
The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations
Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543 · Cited by 783
Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Authors
- Biernat, M.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1019-1027
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2012378208
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 34.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Broader View of Social Stereotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0003-066x.58.12.1019
- The paper
- Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a Broader View of Social Stereotyping. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.12.1019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
