Cited by 1,169Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis.

Else-Quest, Nicole M., Hyde, Janet Shibley, Goldsmith, H. Hill, Van Hulle, Carol A.·2006·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The authors used meta-analytical techniques to estimate the magnitude of gender differences in mean level and variability of 35 dimensions and 3 factors of temperament in children ages 3 months to 13 years. Effortful control showed a large difference favoring girls and the dimensions within that factor (e.g., inhibitory control: d = -.41, perceptual sensitivity: d = -0.38) showed moderate gender differences favoring girls, consistent with boys' greater incidence of externalizing disorders. Surgency showed a difference favoring boys, as did some of the dimensions within that factor (e.g., activity: d = 0.33, high-intensity pleasure: d = 0.30), consistent with boys' greater involvement in active rough-and-tumble play. Negative affectivity showed negligible gender differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no gender difference in negative affectivity during infancy and childhood.

    “Given no gender difference in negative affectivity in infancy and childhood (Else-Quest et al., 2006), for temperament to account for the emergence of the gender difference in depression in adolescence requires an interaction between vulnerable temperament and some other factor, such as stress, with stress increasing dramatically in adolescence and increasing more for females than males.”
  • Men procrastinate slightly more than women, with a weak negative correlation between female gender and procrastination (r = -.08).

    “Findings suggest a small influence of gender, whereby men procrastinate slightly more than women do, revealing a weak negative correlation between the female gender and procrastination (r = -.08),possibly related to greater selfcontrol among women in general (van Eerde, 2003;Else-Quest, Hyde, Goldsmith, & van Hulle, 2006).”

    From Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2006

  • Females scored higher than males on agreeableness (SMD = 0.56).

    “females scored higher on agreeableness (SMD = 0.56)”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2006

  • Females scored higher than males on forgiveness (SMD = 0.28).

    “forgiveness (SMD = 0.28)”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2006

  • Females scored higher than males on neuroticism (SMD = 0.41).

    “neuroticism (SMD = 0.41)”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Else-Quest et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2006-01
Volume
132
Issue
1
Pages
33-72
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1979582482
Cited by
1,169
References
266
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 61
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
gender differences, temperament, effortful control, inhibitory control, perceptual sensitivity, surgency, negative affectivity, children, externalizing disorders, rough-and-tumble play, emotional reactivity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Personality Development, Psychological Theory, Sex Factors, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review